From: Greegor on
G > Could you explain your claims about the
G > fair hearing and the registry in light of
G > this news story?

DJS3 > Which claims specifically?

G > Your claims that you got a fair hearing each time, Dan?

DJS3 > I didn't say that.

G > The news article says different.

DJS3 > I didn't see my name mentioned in the news article, grag.

G > So?

DJS3 > First you lied and said the news article had
DJS3 > a claim from me that I "got a fair hearing each time."
DJS3 >
DJS3 > Now when I point out your lie you respond with "so."
DJS3 >
DJS3 > How many times a week do you see your psychologist, grag?

G > That you claim you had a "fair hearing" at all
G > contradicts the news article doesn't it?

DJS3 > No, but if you believe differently, please explain in detail.

G > That you deny the conflict between your claims
G > and the news article is particularly interesting, Dan.

DJS3 > There is no conflict.

The AGENCY shredded appeals by the THOUSANDS,
at the level of a CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY, but
miraculously all FIVE of your appeals supposedly
made it and went your way?

You really ARE ""special"" aren't you, Dan?
From: Dan Sullivan on
On Apr 7, 2:23 pm, Greegor <greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> G > Could you explain your claims about the
> G > fair hearing and the registry in light of
> G > this news story?
>
> DJS3 > Which claims specifically?
>
> G > Your claims that you got a fair hearing each time, Dan?
>
> DJS3 > I didn't say that.
>
> G > The news article says different.
>
> DJS3 > I didn't see my name mentioned in the news article, grag.
>
> G > So?
>
> DJS3 > First you lied and said the news article had
> DJS3 > a claim from me that I "got a fair hearing each time."
> DJS3 >
> DJS3 > Now when I point out your lie you respond with "so."
> DJS3 >
> DJS3 > How many times a week do you see your psychologist, grag?
>
> G > That you claim you had a "fair hearing" at all
> G > contradicts the news article doesn't it?
>
> DJS3 > No, but if you believe differently, please explain in detail.
>
> G > That you deny the conflict between your claims
> G > and the news article is particularly interesting, Dan.
>
> DJS3 > There is no conflict.
>
> The AGENCY shredded appeals by the THOUSANDS,
> at the level of a CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY, but
> miraculously all FIVE of your appeals supposedly
> made it and went your way?

The shredding by CPS was done in a single month in 2004, which didn't
coincide with any of of my appeals.