From: Mark Probert on
On Jan 23, 10:33 am, Roman Bystrianyk <rbystria...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Sources:
> Randolph K. Byers, M.D. and Frederic C. Moll, M.D., Encephalopathies
> Following Prophylactic Pertussis Vaccine, Pediatrics, April 1948, Vol.
> 1, No. 4, pp. 437-456

Taking a course in theAncient History of Medicine? The pertussis
vaccine of 1948 is so far from the pertussis vaccine used since the
1990's and today that it is laughable you even posted this.

Further, citing the Geiers, et al, and some of the discredited
journals you did, is a joke.

From: Mike on
Mark Probert wrote:
> On Jan 23, 10:33 am, Roman Bystrianyk <rbystria...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sources:
>> Randolph K. Byers, M.D. and Frederic C. Moll, M.D., Encephalopathies
>> Following Prophylactic Pertussis Vaccine, Pediatrics, April 1948, Vol.
>> 1, No. 4, pp. 437-456
>
> Taking a course in theAncient History of Medicine? The pertussis
> vaccine of 1948 is so far from the pertussis vaccine used since the
> 1990's and today that it is laughable you even posted this.
>

And why is the pertussis vaccine different? Well, in large part due to
heroic efforts of Barbara Loe Fisher (www.nvic.org) and others like her.
She did not stop there and continues to educate the public. Vaccine
flacks cannot forgive that and call them names, the mildest being
"anti-vac liars". So, speaking broadly, it is far from ancient history.