From: Jan Drew on
On Aug 6, 10:47 pm, Linda <indomitab...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 3:30 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 6, 9:30 am, "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> .
>
> > You cannot get to misc.health alternative, either.
>
> Not true.
>
> Anyone can get misc.health.alternative,  Jan.
>
> All you have to do to get misc.health.alternative is to pay a monthly
> fee to one of the many unscrupulous NNTP's a/k/a news servers
> which carry all of usenet's news groups.
>
> Alternatively,   you can access misc.health.alternative by signing up
> for one of the many "free" newsservers (most if not all of which are
> even more unscrupulous than the unscrupulous NNTP's one must pay to
> use to access Usenet's Newsgroups.)
>
> My problem with accessing MHA or any other usenet newsgroup via the
> unscrupulous NNTPs and/or free newsservers I mentioned above is that
> the NTTP's and Free Newsservers all make it easy as pie for the
> criminal element to impersonate,  frogger,  forge and steal OP's
> online identities.
>
> However,  you and any other google groups user who doesn't mind having
> members of the criminal element impersonate,  frogger,  forge,  and
> steal your online identity,  in part or whole,   can get MHA via the
> same NNTPs and/or free newsservers which the criminal element uses to
> access MHA and other usenet newsgroups.
>
> Regards,
>
> LMG

Ok, thanks. But I did not do anything with those kind of people.
From: Mark Probert on
On Aug 7, 11:26 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 10:47 pm, Linda <indomitab...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 6, 3:30 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 6, 9:30 am, "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > .
>
> > > You cannot get to misc.health alternative, either.
>
> > Not true.
>
> > Anyone can get misc.health.alternative,  Jan.
>
> > All you have to do to get misc.health.alternative is to pay a monthly
> > fee to one of the many unscrupulous NNTP's a/k/a news servers
> > which carry all of usenet's news groups.
>
> > Alternatively,   you can access misc.health.alternative by signing up
> > for one of the many "free" newsservers (most if not all of which are
> > even more unscrupulous than the unscrupulous NNTP's one must pay to
> > use to access Usenet's Newsgroups.)
>
> > My problem with accessing MHA or any other usenet newsgroup via the
> > unscrupulous NNTPs and/or free newsservers I mentioned above is that
> > the NTTP's and Free Newsservers all make it easy as pie for the
> > criminal element to impersonate,  frogger,  forge and steal OP's
> > online identities.
>
> > However,  you and any other google groups user who doesn't mind having
> > members of the criminal element impersonate,  frogger,  forge,  and
> > steal your online identity,  in part or whole,   can get MHA via the
> > same NNTPs and/or free newsservers which the criminal element uses to
> > access MHA and other usenet newsgroups.
>
> > Regards,
>
> > LMG
>
> Ok, thanks.  But I did not do anything with those kind of people.

From: Peter B. on
"Jan Drew" <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:2fdc0704-1fd1-4dee-ba64-a98aa4510c79(a)5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 6, 10:47 pm, Linda <indomitab...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 3:30 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 6, 9:30 am, "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> .
>
> > You cannot get to misc.health alternative, either.
>
> Not true.
>
> Anyone can get misc.health.alternative, Jan.
>
> All you have to do to get misc.health.alternative is to pay a monthly
> fee to one of the many unscrupulous NNTP's a/k/a news servers
> which carry all of usenet's news groups.
>
> Alternatively, you can access misc.health.alternative by signing up
> for one of the many "free" newsservers (most if not all of which are
> even more unscrupulous than the unscrupulous NNTP's one must pay to
> use to access Usenet's Newsgroups.)
>
> My problem with accessing MHA or any other usenet newsgroup via the
> unscrupulous NNTPs and/or free newsservers I mentioned above is that
> the NTTP's and Free Newsservers all make it easy as pie for the
> criminal element to impersonate, frogger, forge and steal OP's
> online identities.
>
> However, you and any other google groups user who doesn't mind having
> members of the criminal element impersonate, frogger, forge, and
> steal your online identity, in part or whole, can get MHA via the
> same NNTPs and/or free newsservers which the criminal element uses to
> access MHA and other usenet newsgroups.
>
> Regards,
>
> LMG

Ok, thanks. But I did not do anything with those kind of people.

================================================
Yes you did Mom. I saw you with my own eyes!

From: trigonometry1972 on
On Aug 4, 8:20 am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 3, 5:03 am, "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Mark Probert-Drew" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:b9f516f9-55cc-46e9-9fef-d1df89ef138b(a)g21g2000prn.googlegroups.com....
> > On Aug 1, 5:14 am, "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:437e5f67-e78b-456e-8b08-4cd28628ffae(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > > Mark Stanley Probert
> > > > Peter Bowditch
> > > > Peter B
> > > > Peter Moran
> > > > Martin Rady
> > > > Bob Officer
> > > > Andrew Kingoff
> > > > DC Sessions
> > > > Ken Flakey
> > > > Steelclaws
> > > > Happy Oyster
>
> > > The problem Jan, with these poor demented sods, is that they can't think
> > > in
> > > terms of conspiracies.
>
> > Wrong. I believe that you, Jan, and David are part of BigQuack, the
> > secret society of altie nut cases that promote quackery.
> > =======================
>
> > And I believe that you and all the conventional mob haven't really got a
> > grasp of the big picture.
>
> I used to watch "The Big Picture" on TV in the 1950's.
>
> I do have an excellent grasp of the "Big Picture" because I think, use
> logic, do research, and have a sound education in the sciences.

Now that show was priceless!! I laughed and shock my head
even as a kid, when it had
a show on above ground nuclear bomb testing. Troops around
the blast!! And a car wash for folks who had happened to travel
thru the fallout area. Of course, they didn't mention the
fall out hot spots spread all the way to New York and
the related milk contamination.
Though I think they had a shows on the healthfulness
of diary products, cranberries, and hot dogs, lol.

It as all about what the government wanted the public
to think. Your parents tax dollars at work.

And of course my childhood rock set had both galena
(shiny lead source) and uranium. One has got
to "love" the 50's and early 60's. And the "Green
Run" lasted to the early 70's......................Trig

Or as someone said one watches the "Big Picture"
'to know what your enemies want you think.'
From: Mark STANLEY Probert on
On Aug 10, 2:20 am, "trigonometry1...(a)gmail.com |"
<trigonometry1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 8:20 am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 3, 5:03 am, "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > "Mark Probert-Drew" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:b9f516f9-55cc-46e9-9fef-d1df89ef138b(a)g21g2000prn.googlegroups.com....
> > > On Aug 1, 5:14 am, "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > > "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:437e5f67-e78b-456e-8b08-4cd28628ffae(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > Mark Stanley Probert
> > > > > Peter Bowditch
> > > > > Peter B
> > > > > Peter Moran
> > > > > Martin Rady
> > > > > Bob Officer
> > > > > Andrew Kingoff
> > > > > DC Sessions
> > > > > Ken Flakey
> > > > > Steelclaws
> > > > > Happy Oyster
>
> > > > The problem Jan, with these poor demented sods, is that they can't think
> > > > in
> > > > terms of conspiracies.
>
> > > Wrong. I believe that you, Jan, and David are part of BigQuack, the
> > > secret society of altie nut cases that promote quackery.
> > > =======================
>
> > > And I believe that you and all the conventional mob haven't really got a
> > > grasp of the big picture.
>
> > I used to watch "The Big Picture" on TV in the 1950's.
>
> > I do have an excellent grasp of the "Big Picture" because I think, use
> > logic, do research, and have a sound education in the sciences.
>
> Now that show was priceless!! I laughed and shock my head
> even as a kid, when it had
> a show on above ground nuclear bomb testing. Troops around
> the blast!!

We used to watch them live on The Today show, with Dave Garroway.

And a car wash for folks who had happened to travel
> thru the fallout area. Of course, they didn't mention the
> fall out hot spots spread all the way to New York and
> the related milk contamination.

Not during the show, but, at other times they mentioned Strontium 90,
which Carole thinks is a nutrient.

> Though I think they had a shows on the healthfulness
> of diary products, cranberries, and hot dogs, lol.

> It as all about what the government wanted the public
> to think. Your parents tax dollars at work.
>
> And of course my childhood rock set had both galena
> (shiny lead source) and uranium. One has got
> to "love" the 50's and early 60's. And the "Green
> Run" lasted to the early 70's......................Trig

I received a kit entitled "Asbestos-The Magic Mineral" from the
Canadian Asbestos Board (or something like that) and did a 'show and
tell' in class.

http://archives.cbc.ca/health/public_health/topics/608/

> Or as someone said one watches the "Big Picture"
> 'to know what your enemies want you think.'-

I also watched Library Lions. Do you recal lthat show?