From: carole on

"Linda" <indomitable4(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4d9d8696-c865-4bda-a545-c62b0b6cb934(a)i19g2000pro.googlegroups.com...

>
> ===================
> Sorry, I don't understand your POV.

Sorry, I don't believe you.

I believe you know my POV is a POV where criminal conspiracies are not
only a fact of life, but, the criminal conspiracy which the USG
perpetrated against my Dad and the three generations of living
Americans who are his descendants is, always has been, and always
will be the most salient feature of my life.

**No, I don't know about any of this.

I believe you know my POV is a POV which acknowledges the existence of
a Consensus wherein everyone knows the corrupt USG perpetrated
criminal conspiracies against other Americans like my Dad, as well
as, the three generations of living Americans who are his/their
descendants.

**No, same again.
Sorry Linda, I have no idea where you are coming from.
You post is just a angry tirade and I don't think you even know what point
you're trying to make.

carole
www.conspiracee.com


I believe you know I'm am taking issue with you for denying the
existence of a consensus wherein everyone knows criminal
conspriacies, such as the criminal conspiracy perpetrated against my
Dad and others, as well as all their descendants, are a fact of
life, and, for instead touting a false consensus wherein only the "oh
so clever" criminals, and, a few "oh so clever" people like yourself
possess the intellegence necessary to know that criminal conspiracies
are a fact of life , whilst everyone other than the "oh so clever"
criminals and/or a few "oh so clever" people like yourself is way too
stupid to realize criminal conspiracies are a fact of life.

I'm taking you to task because the VANITY which incites you to falsely
believe that the "oh so clever" criminals and a few "oh so clever"
people like yourself are the only one's who know that criminal
conspiracies are a fact of life, whilst everyone else is too stupic
to realize that criminal conspiracies are a fact of life, because,
the FALSE CONSENSUS you are touting places you squarely on the side of
the criminals.

Here's why...

Let's say that 12% of Americans are criminally complicit in the
criminal conspiracies which America's criminal overworld has been
perpetrating against the American people for the last 80? years.

Let's say that 84% of Americans know that 12% of American are
criminally complicit in criminal conspiracies which America's criminal
overworld has been perpetrating against the American people for the
last 80? years or so.

However, the vanity of half of Americans is such that they themselves
rather identify with the "oh so clever" criminals; therefore, they
tout a false consensus wherein only America's "oh so clever"
criminals, and, a few "oh so clever" people like themselves know
that 12% of Americans are criminally complicit in criminal
conspiracies which America's Criminal Overworld has been perpetrating
against the American people for the past 80? years or so, and the
rest of the population is way to stupid to know criminal conspiracies
are a fact of life.

Now do the math!

The criminals have got themselves, the 12% of Americans who have been
criminally complicit in the criminal conspiracies which America's
criminal overworld has been perpetrating against the American people
for the last 80? years.

However, the criminals also have the 42% of Americans whose VANITY
incites them to want to identify with the "oh so clever" criminals,
as, being among the few
"oh so clever" one's who are aware that criminal conspiracy instead of
all the other Americans whom these vain Americans depict as being far
too stupid to realize criminal conspiracy is a fact of life in these
United States of America.

In this manner the 12% of Americans ciminally cmplicit in the criminal
conspiracies which America's criminal overworld has been perpetrating
against the American people for the last 80? years, have successfully
preyed on the VANITY of everyone who rather identify with the "oh so
clever" criminals, whom both the criminals and the vain are falsely
depicting as having pulled the wool over the eyes of all those others
who are too stupid, dumb, ignorant, to realize the criminal
conspiracies being perpetrated against them by the 12% of Americans
criminally complicit in those criminal conspiracies.

Now, do you honestly think I've got anything other than abject
contempt for those of you whose vanity incites you to identify with
the "oh so clever" criminals and against We The People, when your
doing so gives these criminals the majority they require on election
day in order to continue to perpetrate their heinous criminal
conspiracies against We The People?










>
> carolewww.conspiracee.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On Aug 3, 5:03 am, "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "Mark Probert-Drew" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b9f516f9-55cc-46e9-9fef-d1df89ef138b(a)g21g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 1, 5:14 am, "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:437e5f67-e78b-456e-8b08-4cd28628ffae(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > Mark Stanley Probert
> > > Peter Bowditch
> > > Peter B
> > > Peter Moran
> > > Martin Rady
> > > Bob Officer
> > > Andrew Kingoff
> > > DC Sessions
> > > Ken Flakey
> > > Steelclaws
> > > Happy Oyster
>
> > The problem Jan, with these poor demented sods, is that they can't think
> > in
> > terms of conspiracies.
>
> Wrong. I believe that you, Jan, and David are part of BigQuack, the
> secret society of altie nut cases that promote quackery.
> =======================
>
> And I believe that you and all the conventional mob haven't really got a
> grasp of the big picture.

I used to watch "The Big Picture" on TV in the 1950's.

I do have an excellent grasp of the "Big Picture" because I think, use
logic, do research, and have a sound education in the sciences.
From: Jan Drew on
On Aug 4, 11:20 am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 3, 5:03 am, "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Mark Probert-Drew" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:b9f516f9-55cc-46e9-9fef-d1df89ef138b(a)g21g2000prn.googlegroups.com....
> > On Aug 1, 5:14 am, "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > "Jan Drew" <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:437e5f67-e78b-456e-8b08-4cd28628ffae(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > > Mark Stanley Probert
> > > > Peter Bowditch
> > > > Peter B
> > > > Peter Moran
> > > > Martin Rady
> > > > Bob Officer
> > > > Andrew Kingoff
> > > > DC Sessions
> > > > Ken Flakey
> > > > Steelclaws
> > > > Happy Oyster
>
> > > The problem Jan, with these poor demented sods, is that they can't think
> > > in
> > > terms of conspiracies.
>
> > Wrong. I believe that you, Jan, and David are part of BigQuack, the
> > secret society of altie nut cases that promote quackery.
> > =======================
>
> > And I believe that you and all the conventional mob haven't really got a
> > grasp of the big picture.
>
> I used to watch "The Big Picture" on TV in the 1950's.
>
> I do have an excellent grasp of the "Big Picture" because I think, use
> logic, do research, and have a sound education in the sciences

What did you use when disbarred? You remained silent.
You ripped of your clients. Then, you lied over, and over.

http://www.nylawfund.org/pubs/97AnRep.pdf

Name Judicial Number of Amount
District Award

Mark S. Probert 10 6 2,900
From: Jan Drew on
Mark Stanley Probert
Peter Bowditch
Peter B
Peter Moran
Martin Rady
Bob Officer
Andrew Kingoff
DC Sessions
Ken Flakey
Steelclaws
Happy Oyster
From: Mark Probert on
On Aug 5, 12:57 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:

Jan keeps harassing and stalking.

What a shame.

Note that GoogleGroups has dropped misc.health.alternative