From: rpautrey2 on
On Jan 29, 8:15 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 11:28 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:54:48 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
>
> > Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >On Jan 28, 5:13 pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
> > >>http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/secret-british-mmr-....
>
> > >I note the timing of this idle conjecture (which is readily
> > >acknowledged every time they mention unconfirmed (a/k/a imaginary)
> > >sources.
>
> > >These dirtbags will say anything to protect Wakefield whose dastardly
> > >deeds are documented in the report.
>
> > The current findings open the door for criminal charges against
> > Wakefield in England, don't they?
>
> I have no idea. However, for anyone who objectively looks at what he
> did, they raise very serious ethics charges. Invasive human surgery
> for no medically justifiable need.


....the deceitful words of Mark S. Probert...
http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/propagandistprobert.html
From: Bob Officer on
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:15:37 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
Mark Probert <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jan 28, 11:28�pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:54:48 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
>>
>> Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Jan 28, 5:13�pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
>> >>http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/secret-british-mmr-...
>>
>> >I note the timing of this idle conjecture (which is readily
>> >acknowledged every time they mention unconfirmed (a/k/a imaginary)
>> >sources.
>>
>> >These dirtbags will say anything to protect Wakefield whose dastardly
>> >deeds are documented in the report.
>>
>> The current findings open the door for criminal charges against
>> Wakefield in England, don't they?
>
>I have no idea. However, for anyone who objectively looks at what he
>did, they raise very serious ethics charges. Invasive human surgery
>for no medically justifiable need.

IIRC there is some talk about criminal charges being filed, both here
in the US and in the UK.


--
Bob Officer
Posting the truth
http://www.skeptics.com.au
From: Mark Probert on
On Jan 29, 5:44 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:15:37 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
>
>
>
>
>
> Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 28, 11:28 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:54:48 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,
>
> >> Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Jan 28, 5:13 pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
> >> >>http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/secret-british-mmr-...
>
> >> >I note the timing of this idle conjecture (which is readily
> >> >acknowledged every time they mention unconfirmed (a/k/a imaginary)
> >> >sources.
>
> >> >These dirtbags will say anything to protect Wakefield whose dastardly
> >> >deeds are documented in the report.
>
> >> The current findings open the door for criminal charges against
> >> Wakefield in England, don't they?
>
> >I have no idea. However, for anyone who objectively looks at what he
> >did, they raise very serious ethics charges. Invasive human surgery
> >for no medically justifiable need.
>
> IIRC there is some talk about criminal charges being filed, both here
> in the US and in the UK.

I do not see any crime being committed here in the US by Wakefield. As
for in the UK, his supporters had better watch out, since the UK libel
laws will work to the favor of those who they are attacking.

From: Jan Drew on
On Jan 28, 7:54�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 5:13�pm, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
>
> >http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/secret-british-mmr-...
>
> I note the timing of this idle conjecture (which is readily
> acknowledged every time they mention unconfirmed (a/k/a imaginary)
> sources.

Do prove that claim. Exactly what is unconfirmed (a/k/a imaginary)
> sources



Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action
>
> These dirtbags will say anything to protect Wakefield whose dastardly
> deeds are documented in the report.

Care to show us your dastardly deed, and how you remained silent when
disbarred????

Note how Mark S Probert will not answer this.

BTW, this is 1-30-10. What happened to your--You have been warned???

Eh?
From: Jan Drew on

....the deceitful words of Mark S. Probert...
http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/propagandistprobert.html



First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Jack Schitt
Next: Bob Officer posting lies and spam again