From: Jan Drew on 6 Nov 2009 23:51
On Nov 3, 10:09ï¿½pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Nov 3, 8:20 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > PeterB - Original wrote:
> > > On Nov 3, 6:02 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > >> john wrote:
> > >>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw43QDiaDnE
> > >>> VaccinePrimer Oct23 mp4. Physicians and health professionals are now
> > >>> speaking out clearly of the risks and dangers of vaccination.
> > >>> We have tip toed around the American Medical model long enough. Vaccines
> > >>> come with a great risk including juvenile diabetes, asthma, ADD, ADHD, and
> > >>> Autism. And never mind the more subtle injury of teenagers who can't focus
> > >>> and are depressed.
> > >> That's totally untrue. Vaccines have been shown to be safe and
> > >> effective. They are not 100% safe: There are some risks. However, the
> > >> benefits greatly outweigh the risks. There is no evidence that vaccines
> > >> cause ADHD, autism, difficulty focusing or depression. If I am
> > >> incorrect, please provide the citations to the peer-reviewed journal
> > >> articles.
> > > In the absence of proper safety data on vaccine, it's use violates a
> > > responsible application of the Precautionary Principle, which states
> > > that proponents of any intervention (medical or otherwise) be required
> > > to prove such safety.
> > Yet, your assumption that there are not proper safety data are flawed.
> > > As a proponent of vaccine, it is YOUR
> > > responsibility to produce that data.
> > Actually, you got that backwards. It's your responsibility to support
> > your claims
> And yours and yours alone to take responsibility to prove you are a
> You have failed to do so. ï¿½That makes you a hypocrite, Jeffrey, Peter,
> Joseph Utz.
From: Jan Drew on 7 Nov 2009 17:34
Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
And now-- dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu>