Prev: SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT RECLASSIFYING ALL FLU DEATHS AS SWINE FLU DEATHS
Next: The YENTA has proof--100 proof...
From: Peter Bowditch on 1 Dec 2009 18:35 PeterB - Original <pkm(a)mytrashmail.com> wrote: >On Dec 1, 4:56�pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote: >> "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote: >> >> >"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote in message >> >> >> Scopie's Law is not a logical fallacy, and nowhere did I use ad >> >> hominem. >> >> >care to explain that one >> >> >This is ad hominem: >> >> >"I mentioned to Marcia that these people are mad. I saw Dr Kalokerinos on >> >stage once and he is the most insane person I have ever seen outside a >> >mental hospital." >> >> A comment on the evidence before me. Kalokerinos was behaving >> as an insane person would behave, and mentioning this is not ad >> hominem. > >Another dictionary-challenged moment by Peter Bowditch. > >Ad hominem: "Appealing to personal considerations rather than to fact >or reason." A person stands on a stage and announces that the World Health Organization and the Save The Children Fund are engaging in a deliberate policy of genocide by spreading AIDS in Africa through the medium of measles vaccination. There was no fact. There was no reason. The speaker is insane. QED. > >Let's see. You never use fact or reason and you always resort to >derogatory characterizations as a way to win your so-called >arguments. One day, "Bowditch" will be a proper noun meaning "Logic >Train Wreck." At least it will refer to some who is not too cowardly to tell people his name. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
From: john on 2 Dec 2009 04:44
"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname(a)ratbags.com> wrote in message news:ot9bh51f6gismh6ilvqpjsj8949rj7sbbm(a)4ax.com... PS, outside your pharmaland reality, the Posse etc it is instructive to see how absurd your reasoning is the reality of non-think, and amazing that educated people could swallow such obvious logical absurdities, but any historical look at religious thinking would find similar examples |