From: pautrey on
On Jun 7, 1:40 pm, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...(a)> wrote:

From: Happy Oyster <happy.oys...(a)>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:40:31 +0300
Local: Mon, Jun 7 2010 1:40 pm
Subject: Re: Natural births better for babies


What in the hell is wrong with you?

Are you trying to start something again?

Do not stalk me!

Natural births better for babies DANIELLE TEUTSCH AND KATE BENSON
May 30, 2010

Comments 48
Bacteria ... A scientist says babies benefit from being born
BABIES born by caesarean section are more vulnerable to asthma,
allergies and infection as they miss out on receiving their mothers'
good bacteria during birth, a scientist says.

Professor Patricia Conway, of the School of Biotechnology and
Biomolecular Sciences at the University of NSW, said babies delivered
vaginally received protective bacteria as they passed through the
birth canal. Left on the baby's skin, this bacteria could then
colonise the intestine and help inoculate newborns against hospital
bugs. Gut flora was also crucial for developing a balanced immune
system, Professor Conway said. "With a C-section, the newborn baby
misses an opportunity to pick up a lot of mum's good bacteria," she

"This can have long-term health implications, as the development of a
good intestinal ecosystem is necessary for health and immunity to
allergies, from childhood right through to adulthood."

Professor Conway said emergency caesareans, performed after labour had
begun, meant babies did receive some of the beneficial bacteria,
particularly if the waters had broken. But elective caesareans were
''sterile'' and gave babies no chance to pick up any of the mother's
good bacteria.

However babies had other chances to receive their mother's bacteria,
during skin-to-skin contact directly after birth and if they were

Australian College of Midwives vice-president Hannah Dahlen said
babies born vaginally had the advantage of hormonal surges during
labour, which made them more wide-eyed and able to connect with their

Both mother and baby experienced a surge in catecholamines - the fight-
or-flight hormone - during labour, making babies more alert at birth.

Recent studies had shown white blood cells in babies born by caesarean
were different to those born vaginally, potentially altering the way
their bodies responded to attacks on their immune systems for the rest
of their lives.

The studies could explain dramatic increases in rates of diabetes,
testicular cancer, leukaemia and asthma among babies born surgically,
Dr Dahlen said.

Read More:
From: pautrey on
On Jun 7, 4:06 pm, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...(a)> wrote:

From: Happy Oyster <happy.oys...(a)>
Subject: Re: Natural births better for babies
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:06:45 +0300
Organization: MLM Trap
Lines: 4796
Message-ID: <6onq06p92h02n8k6gu3knl51joosk0q6u3(a)>
References: <1j5n06551g1eho6aooqks3edqvn2oll728(a)>
<4iko06lf1uembdv8o8ph5fbqkhj6vf0nqh(a)> <4a9cfe5c-f885-4271-
<o4fq06p7r60se77qtg2u6qf5vrtg6cuve8(a)> <37e221ad-a1a7-4958-
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: 1275944751 03 n17385 FlSpBjyvPchglQ7 100607
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse(a)
X-ID: Xj6W3QZdoe-taCy1C902KPiOWwZWpKEFeU9jXAXdDjR0zv2tJYqjsu
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846



What part of "Do not stalk me!" did you not understand?

Again, what in the hell is wrong with you?

I will continue to post in this group regardless of the harassment I

The more I am harassed, the more I post.



Inside the Mind of a Sociopath
This excerpt is from: "The Sociopath Next Door: The Ruthless vs. the
Rest of Us" by Martha Stout Ph.D. (Broadway Books, New York, 2005,
ISBN 0-7679-1581-X). Martha Stout is a clinical instructor at Harvard
Medical School and elaborates on the tales of ruthlessness in everyday
life based on her 25 years of practice as a specialist in the
treatment of psychological trauma survivors.


Imagine - if you can - not having a conscience, none at all, no
feelings of guilt or remorse no matter what you do, no limiting sense
of concern of the well-being of strangers, friends, or even family
members. Imagine no struggles with shame, not a single one in your
whole life, no matter what kind of selfish, lazy, harmful, or immoral
action you had taken. And pretend that the concept of responsibility
is unknown to you, except as a burden others seem to accept without
question, like gullible fools. Now add to this strange fantasy the
ability to conceal from other people that your psychological makeup is
radically different from theirs. Since everyone simply assumes that
conscience is universal among human beings, hiding the fact that you
are conscience-free is nearly effortless. You are not held back from
any of your desires by guilt or shame, and you are never confronted by
others for your cold-bloodedness. The ice water in your veins is so
bizarre, so completely outside of their personal experience that they
seldom even guess at your condition.

In other words, you are completely free of internal restraints, and
your unhampered liberty to do just as you please, with no pangs of
conscience, is conveniently invisible to the world. You can do
anything at all, and still your strange advantage over the majority of
people, who are kept in line by their consciences, will most likely
remain undiscovered.

How will you live your life?

Read More: