|
Prev: CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
Next: Kent!
From: Greegor on 6 Mar 2010 19:13 KBW > Is memory loss a common side effect KBW > of the illegal drugs you admit you KBW > use and abuse (see sig for the KBW > VERBATIM quote of your admission). G > Kent lies and refers to a non existant G > VERBATIM quote that supposedly supports his lie. KBW > I note your post vanished from KBW > google's public archive. KBW > Amazing how that happened, huh? G > How could a "VERBATIM quote" in your sig G > be deleted by me in Google? KBW > The quote came from one of YOUR posts. When did it COME FROM there and why is it missing if you quoted it VERBATIM? And how would I have deleted an ARCHIVE of it? Where was it supposedly ARCHIVED? What happened to the VERBATIM copy you had? So where is it? Did I supposedly delete YOUR messages, too, Kent? Did you forget that you claimed that you had a VERBATIM quote of the thing in your sig? If so, then how could I make it vanish? G > This "VERBATIM quote" you claimed so many times? G > Are you sure you know what a VERBATIM quote is, Kent? KBW > Yes. OK, So where is it, Kent? G > But wait! You claim it was deleted from the ARCHIVE! KBW > Actually, Google's public archive. KBW > Further, I point out it's still KBW > available at other archives. KBW > I note you've RUN from that comment. G > That's even better! KBW > If, as you are trying to imply, KBW > I'm in some way libeling you, When you make claims that you can't back up? You are Kent Bradley Wills, two time felon and garage burglar. You are a chronic liar. > >> please take legal action. Do keep in mind that the truth is a great > >> defense against a charge of libel. While your post is gone from > >> Google's public archive, it's still available at other archives. > > >Please explain how users supposedly delete > >things that are in an archive! > > Please explain why you are being so dishonest, Greg. > People can "nuke" their own posts from Google's public archive.. > You did so with the post I quote where you ADMIT you use and abuse > illegal drugs. > > >KBW > I know of three others that have it. > >KBW > I presume there are more, but don't > >KBW > KNOW this. > > >Nie mog? si? doczeka?! > > Waldizki. > > > > > > > > >> >It's like the broken link to the real > >> >estate information they hoped nobody > >> >would actually check. > > >> That you're too stupid (unable to learn) to know how to make use > >> of links in Google doesn't mean it was broken. > >> That aside, I didn't post it. Your dishonest implication that I > >> did is noted. > > >> >Kent BLUFFs like that a lot. > > >> You imply that I posted the link and then claim I am bluffing? > >> Are you simply confused, or expressing more of your delusions? > > >> >G > which would fall under the FAIR USE > >> >G > exception to copyright law. > > >> >KBW > If it where a news article, and you > >> >KBW > [ had ] quoted the article without > >> >KBW > source referenced, or you did > >> >KBW > reference, but quoted IN FULL, you > >> >KBW > would be in violation. > > >> >KBW > The FAIR USE exception makes this > >> >KBW > vary clear. > > >> >Vary? > > >> I apologize. I meant very. > >> More proof, if any were needed, that I shouldn't be allowed to > >> proofread my own posts :) > > >Albo chodzi? za darmo! > > Your grammar is very bad, Greg. Whatever web site you're using > to translate isn't doing a very good job. Go get some sun, Kent. You're looking rather albino lately.
From: Greegor on 7 Mar 2010 01:42 Why did you claim that the "VERBATIM quote" was in your sig, even though it wasn't actually there when you posted your sig over and over?
From: Greegor on 7 Mar 2010 14:57 G > Why did you claim that the "VERBATIM quote" G > was in your sig, even though it wasn't actually G > there when you posted your sig over and over? KBW > So it's NOT in my sig, yet I post KBW > it over and over IN my sig? KBW > How do you rationalize your KBW > conflicting claims, Greg? What did it mean when you said that the "VERBATIM quote" was in your sig, Kent?
|
Pages: 1 Prev: CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS Next: Kent! |