From: Jan Drew on
Except his own. Then, he remained silent. Then, lied over, and over,
and over.

http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html

"I have never been an attorney, have never claimed to be one, and do
not play one on the internet."

Mark S. Probert of Merrick, NY
Mar 11 2002, 7:37 pm

Such are the deceitful words of Mark S. Probert, disbarred by the New
York Supreme Court in November, 1992.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

" I do not have a little willie. My willie is big."

Mark S. Probert of Merrick, NY
Sun, Jun 4 2006 11:47 am



In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a
Suspended Attorney, Respondent.
Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

92-02731


SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT


183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747


November 9, 1992, Decided


PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]


Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for
the
Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on
February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S.
Probert.


DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose
discipline
upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is
granted; and it is further,


HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings


Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to
cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance
Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.


COUNSEL:


Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for
petitioner.


JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ.,
concur.


Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the
respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and
it is further,


Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately,
the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken
from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,


Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this
Court's
rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned
attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,


Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent,
Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from
practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or
employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or
counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission
or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as
to
the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4)
from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and
counselor-at-law.


OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.


OPINION: [*282]


[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29,
1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the
further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with
the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4,
1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and
prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent
and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special
Referee.


[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served
upon
the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The
petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The
motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992.
The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the
default motion.


The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to
cooperate
with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of
professional misconduct.


The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a
disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent
has
chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must
be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent
in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly,
the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of
attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately


Source:


NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT


Currency Status:


ARCHIVE RECORD


NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION


Name:


MARK PROBERT


Date Of Birth:


11/XX/1946


Gender:


MALE


Address:


1698 WEBSTER AVE


MERRICK, NY 11566


County:


NASSAU


Phone:


516-968-5572


EMPLOYER INFORMATION


Employer:


MARK S PROBERT ESQ


Organization:


PERSON


LICENSING INFORMATION


Licensing Agency:


NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION


License/Certification Type:


ATTORNEY


License Number:


1253889


Issue Date:


00/00/1978


License Status:


DISBARRED


License State:


NY


From: Mark Probert - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 11 2001 4:17 pm
Email: Mark Probert <markpr...(a)my-deja.com>
Groups: k12.chat.teacher


Noah has had one since 11/26/96 (my birthday).
From: Raving on
On Mar 11, 12:36 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:

>
> " I do not have a little willie. My willie is big."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Willie
From: Mark Probert on
On Mar 11, 12:36 am, COUSIN Jan Drew-PROBERT <jdrew63...(a)aol.com>
wrote:

As you can see, I did not change the subject line. I left it intact as
it demonstrates just how low you will go to attack me, my religion, my
business, my family, including my son in a wheelchair.

Jan, you are getting sicker by the minute. Get help, or I will get it
for you.

From: Jan Drew on
On Mar 11, 11:32�am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 12:36�am, Jan DrewT <jdrew63...(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> As you can see, I did not change the subject line. I left it intact as
> it demonstrates just how low you will go to attack me, my religion, my
> business, my family, including my son in a wheelchair.
>
> Jan, you are getting sicker by the minute. Get help, or I will get it
> for you.

UUMM, no I did not write that. You did. There was no attack, just the
facts, and you
posted about your son. Nothing about your religion, your business,
your family, or a wheelchair.

Now, where are you going to get this help for me?
Eh, Mark??
From: Peter B. on
"Jan Drew" <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:ed532209-3d6e-4ca0-9692-ddfc98012210(a)q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 11, 11:32�am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 12:36�am, Jan DrewT <jdrew63...(a)aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> As you can see, I did not change the subject line. I left it intact as
> it demonstrates just how low you will go to attack me, my religion, my
> business, my family, including my son in a wheelchair.
>
> Jan, you are getting sicker by the minute. Get help, or I will get it
> for you.

UUMM, no I did not write that. You did. There was no attack, just the
facts, and you
posted about your son. Nothing about your religion, your business,
your family, or a wheelchair.

Now, where are you going to get this help for me?
Eh, Mark??

========================================
pig