From: Happy Oyster on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:02:51 -0700, Bob Officer <bobofficers(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:

>On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:28:07 +0200, in misc.health.alternative, Happy
>Oyster <happy.oyster(a)ariplex.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:03:56 -0700, Bob Officer <bobofficers(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:30:41 -0700 (PDT), in misc.health.alternative,
>>>Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bobby 666
>>>
>>>Jan Drew how Many 5150s have you been subject to in your long and
>>>lifetime.
>>
>>What is that? Being caught totally drunk, clinging to a streetlight?
>>
>5150 an involuntary psych hold for evaluation, as a danger to
>themselves (or others)

Is that number 5150 part of the police jargon?

..
--
"Weiber sind von der Natur zum gemeinschaftlichen Genu� bestimmt."
(Kapokrates, Fr�hchrist und Klostergr�nder)

Mehr �ber den klerikalen Frauenverschlei�: http://www.reimbibel.de
From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On Mar 25, 12:01 pm, Linda <indomitab...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Stop being obtuse.

She cannot be acute so she has to be obtuse. Like you.
From: Jan Drew on
On Mar 25, 11:14�pm, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 10:36�pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 25, 5:53 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > �I should point out it is from personal experience.
>
> > Like this:

The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to
cooperate
with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of
professional misconduct.


The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a
disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the
****respondent
has chosen not to appear or answer**** in these proceedings, the
charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold
the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore,
granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is
stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective
immediately.

----------------------------------
Snipping the truth won't cover you.
<snip off topic>
From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On Mar 27, 12:45 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 11:14 pm, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 25, 10:36 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 25, 5:53 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I should point out it is from personal experience.
>
> > > Like this:
>
> ----------------------------------
> Snipping the truth won't cover you.

Truly, you do not realize what a Drewing hypocrite you are.