From: Linda on
On Feb 26, 6:09 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 10:10 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 25, 11:32 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > I wonder what Pastor Ortiz
>
> http://www.jewishisrael.com/page/who-really-threatened-pastor
>
>  and his lovely wife would say about you
>
> > using special needs children to attack me, especially when they are
> > not mine?
>
> I did not attack, period.

Of course, you didn't.

However, you titled this thread "Probert isn't to be believed".

Probert's merely providing yet more proof that Probert's is not to be
believed by his 2010 assertion that the photos of the children whom he
said were his own children in 2002, aren't his children, but, other
peoples children whose identity was stolen by Probert for use as
"props" in his monstrous ruse.



From: Peter B on
"Linda" <indomitable4(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b0d830e8-a434-4acb-8d0e-e069e0d68d00(a)m35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 26, 6:09 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 10:10 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 25, 11:32 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > I wonder what Pastor Ortiz
>
> http://www.jewishisrael.com/page/who-really-threatened-pastor
>
> and his lovely wife would say about you
>
> > using special needs children to attack me, especially when they are
> > not mine?
>
> I did not attack, period.

Of course, you didn't.

However, you titled this thread "Probert isn't to be believed".

Probert's merely providing yet more proof that Probert's is not to be
believed by his 2010 assertion that the photos of the children whom he
said were his own children in 2002, aren't his children, but, other
peoples children whose identity was stolen by Probert for use as
"props" in his monstrous ruse.
===============================================
You will have to ask Mark to be sure, but this is what I think happened.
At the time he posted links to the pictures they were named *1.jpg,
*2.jpg and so on. The site is not his, it is a constantly evovling site
as children pass through, graduate, etc. from year to year. So pictures
linked on that page would by updated likewise using the same names as
place holders on that page. It is just that simple.

Of course I don't know what his kids look like so I cannot personally
confirm or deny this, but I do know this is what commonly happens on web
sites. I also know that people name their picts in similar fashion as
can be verified by doing a google search for pic2.jpg. See how many come
up.




From: Mark Probert on
On Feb 26, 9:09 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 10:10 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 25, 11:32 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > I wonder what Pastor Ortiz
>
> http://www.jewishisrael.com/page/who-really-threatened-pastor

That has nothing to do with this. That refers to Pastor David Ortiz,
who is not your pastor

>
>  and his lovely wife would say about you
>
> > using special needs children to attack me, especially when they are
> > not mine?
>
> I did not attack, period.

You post about my family to attack me. The fact that you do not
realize it shows just how mentally deficient you are.

> Stop whining because you were a fool to post your kids pictures.

My son's picture is gone from the website. Why do you use handicapped
children who are not mine to attack me?

I would call you a pig, but that insults pigs.
From: Mark Probert on
On Feb 27, 9:22 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> "Linda" <indomitab...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b0d830e8-a434-4acb-8d0e-e069e0d68d00(a)m35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 6:09 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 26, 10:10 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 25, 11:32 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > I wonder what Pastor Ortiz
>
> >http://www.jewishisrael.com/page/who-really-threatened-pastor
>
> > and his lovely wife would say about you
>
> > > using special needs children to attack me, especially when they are
> > > not mine?
>
> > I did not attack, period.
>
> Of course,  you didn't.
>
> However,  you titled this thread "Probert isn't to be believed".
>
> Probert's merely providing yet more proof that Probert's is not to be
> believed by his 2010 assertion that the photos of the children whom he
> said were his own children in 2002,  aren't his children,  but,  other
> peoples children whose identity was stolen by Probert for use as
> "props" in his monstrous ruse.
> ===============================================
> You will have to ask Mark to be sure, but this is what I think happened.
> At the time he posted links to the pictures they were named *1.jpg,
> *2.jpg and so on. The site is not his, it is a constantly evovling site
> as children pass through, graduate, etc. from year to year. So pictures
> linked on that page would by updated likewise using the same names as
> place holders on that page. It is just that simple.
>
> Of course I don't know what his kids look like so I cannot personally
> confirm or deny this, but I do know this is what commonly happens on web
> sites. I also know that people name their picts in similar fashion as
> can be verified by doing a google search for pic2.jpg. See how many come
> up.

You have nailed it perfectly.

From: Linda on
On Feb 28, 10:35 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 28, 4:07 pm, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Linda" <indomitab...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
the law to reposted what Mark S Probert posted.
>
> > Probert and his groupies are no better then child molesters.
>
> > Oops!
>
> > I forgot!
>
> > Probert's "3 P Boys and M&M" exists no more because all the other
> > members of Probert's 3 P Boys and M & M" were publicly exposed as
> > statatory rapists, convicted child molesters, and, SMBDer's who
> > used children in their "beat em unconscious" scripts.
> > ==================================================
>
> Mark does not have three boys

I never asserted Probert did, silly.

Joseph M. Parsons, John M Palmer, Mark S. Probert and Mark D. Morin
constitute the core members of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organization which ASAD readers dubbed "The 3 P Boys and M & M".

P for Parsons, P for Palmer, P for Probert, and M&M for Mark D.
Morin.

"The 3 P Boys and M & M"

Comprende?



> and I see no proof that he has done
> anything you have listed.

Charlie Manson was convicted of Murder, inspite of the fact that
there existed zero evidence that Charlie Manson ever murdered anyone.