From: Jan Drew on
On Feb 17, 9:06�am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 9:59�pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 10:46 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 16, 6:08 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 13, 10:20 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 13, 3:28 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 12, 1:27 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 12, 9:07 am, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Exactly. However, to hate filled Donna, it is either or.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > She prefers dead kids.-
>
> > > > > > > > > > How am I hate filled?
>
> > > > > > > > > You hate doctors, scientists, Paul Offit, vaccine developers, vaccine
> > > > > > > > > manufacturers, etc. It is clear from your writings.
>
> > > > > > > > No, I dont hate doctors, or scientist. I respect some scientist more
> > > > > > > > than Mother Teresa and she is my idol!
>
> > > > > > > WOW! You fooled me. I'll take a wait and see.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Why are you getting so nasty with me?
>
> > > > > > > > > I presume you saw my email addressing the same issue.
>
> > > > > > > > > When you lie with pigs, you get dirty.
>
> > > > > > > > So, if I agree with anyone on the issues, Im automatically dirty?
>
> > > > > > > I did not say that.
>
> > > > > > Correct. Now, answer her question.-
>
> > > > > If you were capable of reading for comprehension, you would know that
> > > > > I did answer her question. However, since you are functionally
> > > > > illiterate, you did not understand the answer.
>
> > > > So, you cannot answer her question.
>
> > > Wrong, illiterate one, I did answer her question. You are just too
> > > illiterate to understand the answer.
>
> > > > Just as I thought.
>
> > > LIAR! LIAR! Girdle on fire! You did not think. There is no proof that
> > > you can.
>
> > > > Neither can you post without insulting.
>
> > > You have it wrong. Saying what I say to you is a means of motivating
> > > you to post more to me. More evidence. You walk right in.
>
> > > >http://www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter1-6b.html
>
> > > > G-d's
>
> > OOOPPPSSS.
>
> > You didn't post all of it. �Because the FACT is you do ot read Torah
> > everyday.-
>
> No, liar Fale Xian. What I posted was snipped by you.
>
> LIAR! LIAR! Girdle on fire!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

http://www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter1-6b.html


G-d's Justice System


When we judge others, we are setting our own personal justice
system.
If I am constantly finding fault and criticizing others, I send a
message to G-d. Shortcomings should be noticed and highlighted;
there's no room for mercy and tolerance. And G-d allows us to fashion
the very justice system with which He views us. If we see only the
bad
in others, we bring upon ourselves the very judgment we, in our
minds,
visit upon others daily.


http://www.yeshiva.org.il/midrash/shiur.asp?id=338


In the next portion of the midrash, the sages teach that it is
fitting
for people to speak in clean, appropriate language:"


The words of Hashem are pure'...In the Torah, God chose to write
eight
extra words in order to avoid using terminology which was not 100%
'clean. In the Book of Bereishit, for instance, Noach is told to
choose for the ark from among 'the pure cattle and from the cattle
that is not pure...' [- instead of referring to the latter group
using
the Hebrew term for ritually impure beasts, "Tameh." ] In
disqualifying the rabbit as a pure animal, the Torah does not say
that
the impurity derives from the fact that the rabbit does not have
split
hooves, [though this is true] but rather that the rabbit is impure
because it [only] chews its cud. (Vaykira 11)" The clear message of
the midrash: when unpleasant things are uttered, they must be
expressed in the cleanest, most honorable manner possible.


When we talk about being careful about speech, we're talking about
two
different issues. What to say, and how to say it.


First of all, it is important not to say things that need not be
said.
When something is in need of being said, it should be expressed using
clean, appropriate language. I've mentioned on several occasions that
Rav Tzvi Yehuda Kook (of blessed memory) was very cautious with his
words, always carefully weighing what he had to say before he said
it.
He would never say things in the negative, but would always couch his
ideas in positive terms.
From: Peter B on

"Jan Drew" <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:8e30c23a-d73d-4d3f-aa0c-e686f764a8ac(a)g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 17, 9:06�am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 9:59�pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 10:46 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 16, 6:08 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 13, 10:20 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 13, 3:28 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 12, 1:27 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 12, 9:07 am, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Exactly. However, to hate filled Donna, it is
> > > > > > > > > > > either or.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > She prefers dead kids.-
>
> > > > > > > > > > How am I hate filled?
>
> > > > > > > > > You hate doctors, scientists, Paul Offit, vaccine
> > > > > > > > > developers, vaccine
> > > > > > > > > manufacturers, etc. It is clear from your writings.
>
> > > > > > > > No, I dont hate doctors, or scientist. I respect some
> > > > > > > > scientist more
> > > > > > > > than Mother Teresa and she is my idol!
>
> > > > > > > WOW! You fooled me. I'll take a wait and see.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Why are you getting so nasty with me?
>
> > > > > > > > > I presume you saw my email addressing the same issue.
>
> > > > > > > > > When you lie with pigs, you get dirty.
>
> > > > > > > > So, if I agree with anyone on the issues, Im
> > > > > > > > automatically dirty?
>
> > > > > > > I did not say that.
>
> > > > > > Correct. Now, answer her question.-
>
> > > > > If you were capable of reading for comprehension, you would
> > > > > know that
> > > > > I did answer her question. However, since you are functionally
> > > > > illiterate, you did not understand the answer.
>
> > > > So, you cannot answer her question.
>
> > > Wrong, illiterate one, I did answer her question. You are just too
> > > illiterate to understand the answer.
>
> > > > Just as I thought.
>
> > > LIAR! LIAR! Girdle on fire! You did not think. There is no proof
> > > that
> > > you can.
>
> > > > Neither can you post without insulting.
>
> > > You have it wrong. Saying what I say to you is a means of
> > > motivating
> > > you to post more to me. More evidence. You walk right in.
>
> > > >http://www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter1-6b.html
>
> > > > G-d's
>
> > OOOPPPSSS.
>
> > You didn't post all of it. �Because the FACT is you do ot read
> > Torah
> > everyday.-
>
> No, liar Fale Xian. What I posted was snipped by you.
>
> LIAR! LIAR! Girdle on fire!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

http://www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter1-6b.html
http://www.yeshiva.org.il/midrash/shiur.asp?id=338
================================================
You are such a hypocrite. It would take a gallon of nitric acid to
pierce that hard heart of yours.