Kent denied his OWN birthday list web page
in [Adoption]
|
Prev: Kent denied his OWN birthday list web page
Next: Kent denied his OWN usenet posts BRAGGING about SELLING 202 NW College Ave Kent can delete his usenet posts but other people quoted Kent
From: Greegor on 8 Mar 2010 12:26 G > Kent, You had your name and birthday removed G > from the list long BEFORE the domain lapsed. KBW > My real name and real birthday were never on the site. And the posts you made about selling the apartment building at 202 NW College? Have you disavowed those comments as well? They connect you with Fred and Janet Wills who sold it to SWEENEYS. What a COINCIDENCE that SWEENEY RENTALS had to sue you in small claims court in 1999! LOL KBW > You openly admitted my name in real life isn't Kent Another LIE. Got a LINK? IF you were not Kent Bradley Wills, then why would you be so concerned about your ""Fake ID"" working so well? Why would you go to all the trouble to create such a good ""Fake ID"" and then go to this much trouble to try to ruin your ""Fake ID"" ?? > and that the > information you post, including the date of birth, isn't about me. > Unless you are going to claim you lied with each admission, you > must admit you lie when you make the claims they are true. You've > offered yourself no other options, Greg, since the conflicting claims > can't all be true. KBW > He makes the claim G > The claims about the domain lapse are all yours. > What is a doain? > If you mean domain, anyone with an interest may verify the truth > by visitinghttp://www.pcpages.com > Unless you fear the truth that another of your lies has been > exposed, you'll visit and report on what you see. G > My claim is about your removal of your G > name and birthday from the list BEFORE G > the domain lapse. KBW > You claimed I expunged the site. No, just your name and birthday, from it. KBW > Your own links PROVE you the > liar you are. The entire domain expired, resulting in all pages going > away. > You may LIE about this as often as your mind requires. As with > all your other claims, your lies will remain lies. > > > > >> near the end of the post to which I am replying. Greg's > >> admitted use and abuse of illegal drugs gives him many delusions. > > >> >> It's possible the information is still located within the > >> >> archives of pcpages' servers, but I can't be bothered to find out. > > >> >http://www.legalspring.com/articles/misc-legal/20080327/566781_Kent-B.... > > >KBW > Whereas it was PROVED you edited the list > > >Lie. Kent is constantly declaring himself victorious. > > It was proved well over a year ago. Your dishonest denial will > never alter this truth. > If you didn't edit it, then someone else did and you posted it > without checking. > Which is the case, Greg? > > > > >KBW > (unless you wish to > >> admit someone else did and you posted it without checking), linking to > >> your edited list only serves to prove how desperate you are to > >> continue lying. > > >The archive of posts and references > >to the birthday list proves you are > >telling lies, Kent. > > The only posts you reference are yours, or posts quoting your > lies. Whereas you are psychologically UNABLE to be honest, unless you > make a mistake or are forced, you only manage to further prove your > lies. > >KBW > Why do you have the overpowering psychological > >KBW > NEED to lie, Greg? Serious question. > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question > > >http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/itl/graphics/adhom/loaded.html > > Avoidance noted. > Now that you have that out of the way, please address the > question. I've exposed so many of your lies that it's clear you do > have an overpowering psychological NEED to lie. I would like to know > why. > It's a matter of curiosity on my part. I keep proving you a liar, > and you keep posting the same lies. > > > > >> >http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:wEMvzeKwaFIJ:www.legalspring.com/... > > >> Again, posting a link to that which you edited, and that which > >> you have admitted isn't about me doesn't prove your current claim. It > >> only adds more proof you are psychologically UNABLE to be honest, > >> unless you make a mistake or are forced. Not that any more proof is > >> needed. > > >Kent, Usenet posts prior to late July 2008 > >and shortly after, reflect the truth of > >what your birthday page said. > > Your own posts only show that you have been lying about the > contents of the site since then. Even if that were true, which it isn't, didn't you forget about what was posted about it to usenet BEFORE then? > >You weren't in the habit of using x-no-archive > >then but even if you deleted some of > >the messages where you acknowledged > >the late July change, they probably > >exist, reflected in others posts quoting you. > > I make no such acknowledgement. > Prove me wrong. If I used Gregborn Logic and nuked any (I > didn't, but let's pretend it's possible), link to any posts that quote > them. > Please don't link to any of your, or Ken's, posts where you > committed the act of post editing. http://www.pcpages.com/altfriends/bday.html > >> >alt.friends birthday list Names are in no particular order. > >> >Name Birthday Email > >> >1 Nancy (Cranky Cat) Mar 13, 1957 crankycat1 at hotmail.com > >> >2 Sharon (Stinkweed) Apr 6 > >> >3 Bianca (Motherbink) Apr 28, 1960 motherbink at yahoo.com > >> >4 Matthew May 12, 1982 troutd at localnet.com > >> >5 Vijay Kumar R Zanvar May 19, 1977 vijoeyz at hotmail.com > >> >6 Warren Davies May 24, 1931 w.davies at comcast.net > >> >7 Gayle (Piper) June 3, 1944 shamrea at hotmail.com > >> >8 Augustin (Jean Claude) Jun 18, 1938 jean.toussaint at bluewin.ch > >> >9 Old Codger(TX) Jul 10 old.codger at overthehill.com > >> >10 Erica Visser Sep 02, 1931 ha.visser at hccnet.nl > >> >11 Doug Best Sep 13, 1950 dbest at mail.geneseeschools.org > >> >12 Bigbazza (Barry)..Oz Oct 15, 1939 big underscore bazz at bigpond > >> >dot net dot au > >> >13 Kent Wills (Your Webmaster) Jan 8, 1969 compuelf at gmail dot > >> >com > > >> You've already admitted you stalk the members of alt.friends due > >> to your use and abuse of illegal drugs. I quote your open admission > >> in my sig. Aside from listing who wrote what, it's a direct copy and > >> paste of one of your posts. > >> While it's nice that you wish to offer more PROOF that you're > >> nothing but a drug addled loser, it's no longer necessary. No one has > >> tried to counter the truth of your admission. > > >> >Nancy is from Canada. > >> >Sharon is from Wisconsin. > >> >Motherbink lives in Slidell, Louisiana, USA. > >> >Matthew is from Baltimore, Maryland, USA. > >> >Vijay is from Bangalore, India. > >> >Warren is from Petaluma, California. > >> >Gayle is from Alabama, USA. > >> >Augustin is in Switzerland. > >> >Old Codger is from Texas. > >> >Erica Visser lives in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. > >> >Dough Best is from Genesee Michigan. > >> >Bigbazza lives in Sydney, Australia. > > >> >http://www.nnseek.com/e/ia.talk.misc/our_kent_wills_is_a_convicted_bu.... > > >> Linking to your own post only serves to prove that you were > >> lying. Of course, this truth is so accepted, NO ONE has ever tried to > >> counter it. > > >> >http://WWW.pcpages.com/altfriends/bday.html > > >> From the URL: > > >> The domain pcpages.com has expired. If you owned this domain, please > >> contact your domain registration service provider for further > >> assistance. If you need help identifying your service provider, visithttp://tucowsdomains.com/help/. > > >> Looks like the people in charge of pcpages has allowed the domain > >> to expire again. > >> Will you claim, once again, that this means I expunged the Friends > >> web site? You make the claim below, so you'll have to again. Either > >> that or admit another of your MANY drug induced lies has been exposed. > > >> >alt.friends birthday list Names are in no particular order. > > >13 Kent Wills (Your Webmaster) Jan 8, 1969 compuelf at gmail > KBW > That NEVER appeared on the site. You KBW > edited what was listed, as was proved KBW > a very long time ago. G > Got a LINK? > Yes. > As has been the requirement for over a year, once you post the > picture you claim to posses of David dressed as a Nazi, and the one > you claim to posses of me on a pony, or admit you've been lying about > the existence of both the whole time, I'll post it. > Aside from one time when I offered to suspend the requirement (and > you RAN from it), this requirement has been in place for over a year. > Still you make requests. Of course you do this in hopes of conning > anyone reading into thinking I'm being less than honest. > Your con has been exposed so often I have to wonder why you > continue to use it. Kent, Why do you think that withholding proof of what you say would help your arguments or hurt my arguments? I think it's silly that you refuse to prove anything you say because I once had to withold proof from you. KBW > People did visit the site and KBW > they saw that the name and date of birth KBW > were not what you claimed and claim. G > Please LINK to their posts! G > You liar. KBW > As soon as you post the picture you KBW > claim to posses of David dressed as KBW > a Nazi and the picture you claim to KBW > posses of me on a pony, KBW > or admit you've been lying about the KBW > existence of both the whole time, KBW > I'll do so with a smile. KBW > It's up to you, Greg. > >> The original listed my name as Brian Jones. > >> I didn't commit the date of birth I listed > >> to memory, but I think it was July something of > >> 1974. I do recall it was the early 70's. > >> If you have the original list, not the
From: Greegor on 8 Mar 2010 15:36
On Mar 8, 1:57 pm, Kent Wills <compu...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >G > Kent, You had your name and birthday removed > >G > from the list long BEFORE the domain lapsed. > > >KBW > My real name and real birthday were never on the site. > > >And the posts you made about selling > >the apartment building at 202 NW College? > > Also never on the site. Your claim that it ever was is yet > another of your MANY lies. > > >Have you disavowed those comments as well? > > No such comments ever appeared on the Friends' web site. Feel > free to prove any did, a win for you, or admit another of your MANY > pathological lies has been exposed. > The choice is yours, Greg. Cute, But I was referring to usenet posts. And you did not deny the statements, only your mistaken idea of the location of the statements. > >They connect you with Fred and Janet Wills > >who sold it to SWEENEYS. > > First, no such connection appeared anywhere on the site. I was not referring to the birthday page and you KNEW I was not. You have not denied the usenet posts in which you connected yourself to the Apartment building at 202 NW College Ave in Ankeny. You have also not denied the public records that connect 202 NW College Ave, Ankeny to Fred and Janet Wills. Kent removed his own name from his birthday page in late July 2008. Prior to that, when I quoted that page, Kent's own reaction was NOT indicative of any fraud on my part. Kent is lying when he claims that I have misrepresented the birthday list. But Kent posted comments about his personal involvement in the sale of his parents apartment building at 202 NW College in Ankeny Iowa. http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/protest/pickdpP.cgi?dp18100392048000=1&report=WebPublic&fixed=N&sketch=Y&map=Y&photo=Y& He claimed HE sold it. But the real estate records show that his parents sold it to Sweeneys. On 1994-04-26 in book 7010 on page 188: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R. sold 202 NW College Ave to: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST Also, there is a court record where Sweeneys sued Kent DOB Jan 8, 1969 for a few hundred dollars in 1999. http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ Iowa Courts Online Search < Start A Case Search Here! > click Iowa Courts Online Search Search Selection Under Trial Court < click on Case Search > Wills Kent B 02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE 05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ****** 05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT 05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT 05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT 05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969 05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969 05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 A list of case numbers will be presented. Click on the SWEENEY case, 4th one down. Under the "Filings" tab: JUDGEMENT DEFAULT BRANDT GREGORY D 08/25/1999 09/01/1999 09/01/1999 Comments: $156.25 7.244% FROM 03/30/99 COMPUTER GENERATED NOTICE 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 Comments: Notice of Proof of Claim RETURN OF ORIGINAL NOTICE 04/21/1999 04/23/1999 04/23/1999 Comments: 4/10/99 KENT PERS 37.60 VERIFICATION OF ACCT HAS BEEN FILED 03/30/1999 03/30/1999 03/30/1999 SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE SWEENEY RENTALS 03/30/1999 03/30/1999 03/30/1999 Comments: UNPAID RENT Under the "Financial" Tab: Summary Orig Paid Due COSTS 98.60 31.00 67.60 FINE 0.00 0.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER 238.46 0.00 238.46 ----------- $337.06 $31.00 $306.06 SUPPORT/ALIMONY N/A 0.00 N/A |