Jackie, Here I am take me la la la
in [Adoption]
|
From: Lilmtncbn on 16 Dec 2006 09:46 > > >Jesus, who the hell are you? >Same as the phony Celesta who posted recently.- LOL! Good eye PB. I thought the post from Celesta was real!
From: Lilmtncbn on 16 Dec 2006 11:03 On Dec 16, 8:43 am, "Lilmtncbn" <lilmtn...(a)aol.com> wrote: >Now I'm confused. This isn't a troll? Ok, I'm answering myself and unconfused now. The OP isn't a troll, she's an adoptee who blogs. I don't agree with all her views, but she's a helluva writer and knows how to dig down to get to the nitty gritty (speaking as an adoptee). I enjoy reading her blog immensely. I'm just wondering what the "egregious and preposterous crimes" thing is all about.
From: Rhiannon on 16 Dec 2006 13:12 Lilmtncbn wrote: > On Dec 16, 8:43?am, "Lilmtncbn" <lilmtn...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >Now I'm confused. ?This isn't a troll? > > Ok, I'm answering myself and unconfused now. The OP isn't a troll, > she's an adoptee who blogs. >I don't agree with all her views, Nor do I. But know what? Being disagreed with doesn't rattle her. > but she's a helluva writer and knows how to dig down to get to the nitty > gritty (speaking as an adoptee). I enjoy reading her blog immensely. I agree on both counts (helluva writer, that is. And always enjoy her blog, even when I don't agree). > I'm just wondering what the "egregious and preposterous crimes" thing > is all about. I've always been rather fond of the word "egregious" myself.
From: joymadsen21 on 16 Dec 2006 15:03 > > Loony bat, be gone. > > > > Kathy Oh and Kathy, the well constructed and relevant insult is not only more interesting but more effective. Just trying to help.
From: Rhiannon on 16 Dec 2006 19:23
Robibnikoff wrote: > <joymadsen21(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1166298745.226871.67820(a)79g2000cws.googlegroups.com... > > For those of you sadly bored enough to care > > Not really Oh, c'mon, Robyn! Don't be coy. Show a little more enthusiasm ;-) |