"It's The Vaccines Stupid!"
in [Breastfeeding]
|
Prev: Monsanto & Cancer Milk: Fox News Kills Story & Fires Reporters
Next: GARDASIL AND HOW IT HAS AFFECTED THE LIVES OF YOUNG AMERICAN WOMEN AND THEIR FAMILIES
From: john on 14 Sep 2009 13:39 http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15074 "It's The Vaccines Stupid!" Part I: Evidence Linking Autism Rise in Children to Vaccinations by F. William Engdahl The WHO and US Government CDC are escalating a public psychological conditioning to create hysteria and panic among an uninformed public about an alleged "virus" H1N1 Influenza A, aka Swine Flu, whose alleged effects to date appear comparable with a common cold. Before people line up in the streets demanding their vaccinations for their children and themselves, it would be wise to remember, to paraphrase a 1992 campaign statement of Bill Clinton to George H.W. Bush: "It's the vaccination, Stupid!" By countless scientific accounts, far more dangerous to human health than any reported incidences of Swine Flu are the dangers of severe health issues including paralysis, brain damage and even death arising from what is added to vaccines by virtually every major vaccine maker. Almost without exception, all commercial vaccines today contain various substances known as adjuvants designed to make the vaccine "work." These adjuvants are the source of horrendous and sometimes deadly damage. It has been speculated for some time that there might be a link in the alarming rise in cases of autism among tiny infants and children and massive multiple vaccinations today given routinely to infants and children from the first hours of birth. There is clear and shocking evidence of the link between the two. If you do not have a strong constitution, you are advised not to read further. A new study shows a direct link between standard childhood vaccination series, MMR, and autism-like symptoms in monkeys. The principal scientist involved in the study, Dr. Laura Hewitson of the University of Pittsburgh, presented the alarming conclusions as an abstract pending publication at the International Meeting for Autism Research. It has been presented at scientific conferences in both London and Seattle, USA. The study compared vaccinated macaque monkeys with non-vaccinated macaques. No major flaws in the study have been revealed by any attending scientist. The vaccines included the popular MMR series. The study found a marked increase in "gastrointestinal tissue gene expression" and "inflammation issues" with those monkeys which received vaccinations. They are a common symptom of children with regressive autism. The study also found marked behavior changes and development differences in those monkeys given the vaccines versus those who were not. "Compared with unexposed animals, significant neuro-developmental deficits were evident for exposed animals in survival reflexes, tests of color discrimination and reversal, and learning sets," the study`s authors reported. "Differences in behaviors were observed between exposed and unexposed animals and within the exposed group before and after MMR vaccination." US Government-mandated research approved by Congress was to begin this year, but the funds were rescinded in early January. Claiming "conflict of interest" because of ongoing court cases, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a long-time supporter of infant vaccinations, withdrew the research plans. The most shocking of all is the recent and now common medical practice, reinforced by an aggressive pharmaceutical industry, of giving multiple vaccines, often virtually within hours of birth, to infants despite the fact that no study including all of the vaccine series commonly given to children in the US and UK, about 30 in all, has been conducted until now. The practice of newborn multiple vaccinations has become widespread in Germany and other EU countries over the past decade. Significantly there have surfaced reports of dramatically increased instances of autism in newborn and infants in various German hospitals over the past decade, precisely the period multiple vaccinations of newborn and infants has become routine. US Government coverup Tragically, the US Government agency theoretically entrusted with guarding public health, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as with the case of health dangers of GMO foods, as well with the dramatic evidence of the link between autism and adjuvants used in typical vaccines, is accepting the argument of big and politically powerful Pharmaceutical companies. The Food and Drug Administration considers vaccines safe but, just as with GMO, they have done no studies into the effects of multiple vaccinations as given in the common childhood series which started in the 1990s in the USA and spread to the UK and now across the EU. According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., son of the late Attorney General and an attorney active in campaigning to expose mercury (Thimerosal) and other toxicity dangers in vaccines, recently stated, "as autism is a behavioral affliction rather than a precisely defined biological injury -- epidemiological studies are critical to establishing its causation. But the greatest source of epidemiological data is the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) -- the government maintained medical records of hundreds of thousands of vaccinated children -- which Health and Human Services Department has gone to great lengths to keep out of the hands of plaintiffs' attorneys and independent scientists.The raw data collected in the VSD would undoubtedly provide the epidemiological evidence needed to understand the relationship between vaccines and autism. The absence of such studies makes it easy for judges to say to plaintiffs they have not met their burden of proving causation." Autism was virtually unknown in the United States until 1943 when it was diagnosed and identified eleven months after Thimerosal, a mercury-based vaccine "adjuvant" was first added to baby vaccines along with various aluminium compounds in the United States. Thimerosal is often used to stem fungi and bacterial growth in vaccines despite massive evidence of its severe effects as a potent neurotoxin. Following independent studies, Russia, Japan, Austria, Denmark, Sweden and Britain have banned Thimersol from childrens' vaccines. Germany to date has no such ban. The toxin was developed in 1930 by Eli Lilly. Tragically in 1991, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary the US Government's Center for Disease Control (CDC), the same agency fuelling the current hysteria over the non-proven H1N1 Swine Flu virus danger, recommended that infants be injected with a series of mercury-containing vaccines in some cases within 24 hours of birth for Hepatitis B and two months for diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis. Before 1989 US pre-school children received eleven vaccinations-polio, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR). By 1999, because of the various CDC recommendations, the number of vaccinations was twenty two before first grade of school. Parallel with this explosive rise in vaccinations of the very young in the United States, according to Kennedy, the rate of autism among children. The state of Iowa reported a 700% increase in autism in children beginning in the 1990's and along with California has banned mercury in vaccines. Despite evidence, however the US FDA continues to allow drug makers to include Thimerosal in numerous over-the-counter non-prescription medications as well as steroids and injected collagen. The US Government ships vaccines preserved with Thimerosal to numerous developing countries as well, where some are reporting sudden explosion of autism rates as well. In China, where autism was unknown before introduction of Thimerosal by US drug makers in 1999, press reports indicate there are almost two million autistic children. Instances of autism in the US exploded as some 40 million children were injected during the 1990's with Thimersol-based vaccines, giving them unprecedented accumulations of mercury poison. The level of ethylmercury in a vaccine routinely given then to children of two months age was 99 times greater than the US Government's daily limit for exposure. As with the current WHO pandemic declaration around H1N1 Swine Flu, the CDC Vaccine Advisory Committee is filled with scientists with close ties to the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Sam Katz, chairman of the committee was a paid consultant to most companies producing the vaccines he "recommended." The aluminium danger remains While vaccines available in the US today exist with no Thimerosal (50% mercury), virtually all vaccines still contain aluminum, which has been linked to impaired neurological development in children. Aluminum has not replaced thimerosal as a vaccine preservative; it has always been used in vaccines. In the recent past, most US chioldren got exposed to both thimerosal and aluminum simultaneously with the hepatitis B, Hib, DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) and pneumococcal vaccines. Combining mercury with aluminum increases the likelihood that the mercury will damage human tissue. According to a recent report by Michael Wagnitz, an American chemist, "Currently eight childhood vaccines that contain aluminum ranging from 125 to 850 micrograms (mcg). These vaccines are administered 17 times in the first 18 months of life, an almost six-fold increase compared to the vaccine schedule of the 1980s." Wagnitz adds, "According to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, based on IV feeding solutions, a child should not exceed a maximum daily dose of 5 mcg of aluminum per kilogram of weight per day. That means if a child weighs 11 pounds, the child should not exceed 25 mcg in a day. This level was determined to be the maximum safety limit based on a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine titled "Aluminum Neurotoxicity in Preterm Infants Receiving Intravenous Feeding Solutions." The hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth, contains 250 mcg. In a 1996 policy statement, "Aluminum Toxicity in Infants and Children," the American Academy of Pediatrics states, "Aluminum can cause neurological harm. People with kidney disease who build up bloodstream levels of aluminum greater than 100 mcg per liter are at risk of toxicity. The toxic threshold of aluminum in the bloodstream may be lower than 100 mcg per liter." What level of aluminium toxicity is contained in vaccines routinely given German, French and other children n the EU is not known. It might be time for a public demand for such information to be disclosed, and before governments launch mass vaccination campaigns for untested vaccines against a non-proven H1N1 Swine Flu threat.
From: Peter Parry on 14 Sep 2009 18:12 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:39:58 +0100, "john" <nospam(a)bt.com> wrote: >Part I: Evidence Linking Autism Rise in Children to Vaccinations > >by F. William Engdahl A political journalist with a degree in engineering and law from 1966 and a belief that petroleum is produced underground by unknown materials conditions and forces deep down in the Earth's core >A new study shows a direct link between standard childhood vaccination >series, MMR, and autism-like symptoms in monkeys. The principal scientist >involved in the study, Dr. Laura Hewitson of the University of Pittsburgh, >presented the alarming conclusions Wouldn't it have been relevant to point out that Dr Hewitson is also a litigant in a vaccine-injury suit? That she is a listed "DAN! Doctor"? In case this gives a reader slight sense of deja vu it would probably also have been relevant to point out she is married to Dan Hollenbeck, a regular contributor to the Age of Autism website and she and her husband are listed as litigants in the Autism Omnibus proceedings? Her husband also works for Wakefield at Thoughtful House as Director of Information Technology and that Hollenbeck's website FightingAutism.org is also owned by and part of Thoughtful House? It might have also been worth mentioning that her "paper" is co-authored by the prolific Wakefield and despite much publicity has yet to appear in a peer-reviewed publication. It is actually merely a poster presentation. >The study compared vaccinated macaque monkeys with non-vaccinated macaques. >No major flaws in the study have been revealed by any attending scientist. Now that is definitely a bit of woo. I'm sure none of the "attending scientists, given their close fiscal links, saw any flaws, others might disagree. With 13 monkeys in the vaccine group, only three in the control group, no mention of randomisation or whether the experimenters were blinded to group or treatment and no mention of age or weight matching the only thing which is certain is that any "result" will be statistically irrelevant. How this translates to "no major flaws" requires the imagination of a journalist. Thirteen infant monkeys were killed for a worthless experiment. One so badly constructed it could never prove a thing. No doubt it improved a few bank balances a bit. >The vaccines included the popular MMR series. The study found a marked >increase in "gastrointestinal tissue gene expression" and "inflammation >issues" with those monkeys which received vaccinations. For some reason almost half the results appear to have been "lost" and do not appear in the presentation.
From: Jan Drew on 14 Sep 2009 19:36 Peter Parry <pe...(a)wpp.ltd.uk> Sure enough one of those stupids showd up.
From: Happy Oyster on 14 Sep 2009 19:47 On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote: > Peter Parry <pe...(a)wpp.ltd.uk> > >Sure enough one of those stupids showd up. Oh, Jan Drew attacks others as "stupid". Very funny because jan Drew is too damned stupid to even count to 2. The guide on how to survive misc.health.alternative 26.8.2009 Rule #2 Do no think that you could discuss with ***************************************** a member of the naturopathic mafia scene. ***************************************** A) Logical thinking versus naturopathic mafia scene B) Examples EXAMPLE 1: "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> EXAMPLE 2: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love22(a)thetruth.com> C) Super-fairy-tales! A) Logical thinking versus naturopathic mafia scene =================================================== Question: How do I know if someone is part of naturopathic mafia scene? Answer: Well, they will not tell you, of course. So you have to see their reactions to certain critical topics and/or patterns of rhetoric. Question: Why is it impossible to discuss with a member of the naturopathic mafia scene? Answer: In a discussion you expect the others to weigh the arguments by scientific facts, by logic, by mathemacical calculation. In short: by sound thinking. But the members of the naturopathic mafia scene do not accept facts as these facts prove that they, the members of the naturopathic mafia scene, are wrong. As the kernal of the naturopathic mafia thinking is that "THEY" are right, they MUST NOT accept anything else. So they start to insult, talk in circles, go wild, bomb you with spam, call your employer... and all those nice things, which the scene is known for. B) Examples =========== EXAMPLE 1: "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> ----------------------------------------------- An amusing incident happened in 2009, when a person, who had shot more than 60,000 postings into the net, demonstrated, that she even is too stupid to count to 2. On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:11:53 -0400, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >[person who is stalked by Jan Drew for years] wrote in message >news:e5d4c9a4-edb6-429e-a95f-9b7fef936df5(a)y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >On Jul 9, 8:51 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >> >> news:rzd5m.6677$kA.770(a)nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com... >> >> >> >> > Posted that Noah his son's birthday was 11/26/96 (my birthday). >> >> > He has numerous posts that are [person who is stalked by Jan Drew for years] >> >> > 2009- 1946 = 64 -in November. My math is not wrong. >> >> > Thus, [person who is stalked by Jan Drew for years] is a liar. > >Since November 2009 is in the future, I will not be 63 until then. > >You are amazingly stupid. > >November 26th 2009 is in 2009. >2009-1946 YOU will be 64, not 63. You are 63 now. On November 26, 2009 you >will be 64. >Period. > >Thanks for proving you are a liar again. >And, I am correct. You and you alone posted your birthday. To make things a bit easier to see, this is a table of events. A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on 26.11.1946 born 26.11.1947 1 year old 26.11.1948 2 years old 26.11.1949 3 years old 26.11.1950 4 years old 26.11.1951 5 years old 26.11.1952 6 years old 26.11.1953 7 years old 26.11.1954 8 years old 26.11.1955 9 years old 26.11.1956 10 years old 26.11.1957 11 years old 26.11.1958 12 years old 26.11.1959 13 years old 26.11.1960 14 years old 26.11.1961 15 years old 26.11.1962 16 years old 26.11.1963 17 years old 26.11.1964 18 years old 26.11.1965 19 years old 26.11.1966 20 years old 26.11.1967 21 years old 26.11.1968 22 years old 26.11.1969 23 years old 26.11.1970 24 years old 26.11.1971 25 years old 26.11.1972 26 years old 26.11.1973 27 years old 26.11.1974 28 years old 26.11.1975 29 years old 26.11.1976 30 years old 26.11.1977 31 years old 26.11.1978 32 years old 26.11.1979 33 years old 26.11.1980 34 years old 26.11.1981 35 years old 26.11.1982 36 years old 26.11.1983 37 years old 26.11.1984 38 years old 26.11.1985 39 years old 26.11.1986 40 years old 26.11.1987 41 years old 26.11.1988 42 years old 26.11.1989 43 years old 26.11.1990 44 years old 26.11.1991 45 years old 26.11.1992 46 years old 26.11.1993 47 years old 26.11.1994 48 years old 26.11.1995 49 years old 26.11.1996 50 years old 26.11.1997 51 years old 26.11.1998 52 years old 26.11.1999 53 years old 26.11.2000 54 years old 26.11.2001 55 years old 26.11.2002 56 years old 26.11.2003 57 years old 26.11.2004 58 years old 26.11.2005 59 years old 26.11.2006 60 years old 26.11.2007 61 years old 26.11.2008 62 years old 26.11.2009 63 years old ************************ 26.11.2010 64 years old On the 26.11. 2009 that person WILL BECOME 63 years old! ******************************************************** But, see above, Jan Drew still insists: >2009-1946 = 63. On oivember 26 of this year he will be 64. Now, a person born on 26.11. 1946 is on the very day "26.11.1946" BORN. 1 year later it will be 1 year old: 26.11.1947 1 year old According to my timeline at 26.11.2009 it will be 63 years old. But Jan Drew insists on On oivember 26 of this year he will be 64. Will Jan Drew be able to point where in my timeline there is an error? Will Jan Drew be able to explain it? Or will she, as usual, bring nothing but more lies, insults, forgeries, or other mess? The answer is: Jan Drew still insists on her ***OBVIOUS*** false claim. So Jan Drew is obviously not able to count to 2. Would you try to discuss with a person who cannot even count to 2? EXAMPLE 2: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love22(a)thetruth.com> ---------------------------------------------------------- "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love22(a)thetruth.com> is constantly bombing the net with his *claimed* religious-based rhetoric warfare. A list of typical quotes of Andrew B. Chung is irregularly posted. Andrew B. Chung supports mass murder: <quote> From: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love20(a)thetruth.com> Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology,alt.support.diabetes,misc.health.alternative,sci.med,alt.christnet.christianlife Subject: Re: Daily Spirit-guided WDJW health tip for 08/10/09 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <fa267b2a-e0e9-4dae-b4f6-ccea1c3830ca(a)j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> Retiring people from existence in this world and taking them up to ****************************************************************** heaven is not murder :-) ******************** </quote> Would you try to discuss with a person who supports mass murder? C) Super-fairy-tales! ===================== All the aggression, all the so very primitive rhetorical tricks are only means to become superior of others who have (more) scientific knowledge. This pattern covers the whole naturopathic scene. That does not exist for itself, but is an overlap of a much larger group: The WHOLE is a large group of people who are incompetent, and - to keep their right to exist - they MUST be superior. So they claim that thinking with their tummy ("Bauchdenken") is superior to science - "as we all know!!!". Any attempt to use scientific arguments for these people is a SEVERE threat, because - if the scientific thinker were right, - they, THE STUPID, are worth nothing. It REALLY is a fight for life. This is why they fight so fiercely, so insanely. The intrigueing point is to see them at the rim of their world, half in the air, half falling, paddling with all their force, because they SEE, that they are not right, but they MUST NOT admit that to themselves. It is a psychical war, in which they cheat themselves, AND THEY DO KNOW IT. Talking normally to such people is absolutely useless. The only way to make them see, is to push them to that rim, to really shock them, and then, PERHAPS, this one or that one gets out of his mental prison. It is like deprogramming sect victims. http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_maer.htm <quote> �berm�rchen *********** 25.10.2008 M�rchen sind M�rchen, also nicht wahr. �berm�rchen sind M�rchen, die wahr sind. Und wenn sie nicht wahr sind, dann macht das gar nichts, weil es sch�n w�re, wenn sie wahr w�ren. Also denke und handle ich, als ob sie wahr sind. UND DANN SIND SIE WAHR. Basta! Das ist die Wahnwelt, in der die Spezies lebt... Das ganze Jahr ist Weihnachten: die Wunschzettel an den Weihnachtsmann werden t�glich ausgef�llt und t�glich erf�llt. Das Schlaraffenland, nicht als vorgefertigte Selbstbedienungslandschaft mit e�barem Interieur, sondern eine vollumf�nglich - auf Bestellung! - vom Universum (auf Befehl!) zu liefernde Realit�t --- hier, jetzt, heute. Der Mensch ist nicht nur wieder der HERR der Sch�pfung (in Gottes Welt und in Gottes Auftrag), nein, er hat Gott-F�higkeiten und regiert SELBER diese Welt: "Ich und Gott haben beschlossen." Da gibt es auch keine Medizin, sondern �bermedizin. Wo in jedem Menschen das Universum lodert, wo die Quantenphysik zur Quantenmedizin wird --- werden Diagnose und Heilung zum Fingerschnipp. Es werde Licht! Aribert Deckers � hier geht's weiter ! [ HOME ] Copyright � 2008 Aribert Deckers and Copyright � 2008 Antares Real-Estate Jegliche Weiterverwendung der Texte von "Wehrhafte Medizin!" ist verboten. Verlage d�rfen sich wegen der Nachdruckrechte per Email an mich wenden. Aribert Deckers </quote> -- "Toll auch der Trick mit dem Eisen, um Gottes Macht zu beweisen. Beileisen lie� Gott nun schwimmen, um neue Fans zu gewinnen." http://www.reimbibel.de
From: Mark Probert on 14 Sep 2009 20:00
On Sep 14, 7:36 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote: > Peter Parry <pe...(a)wpp.ltd.uk> > > Sure enough one of those stupids showd up. You are kind of early for showing up. If you bothered to read what Peter posted, you would see that the "scientists" have a financial stake in the outcome, they murdered monkeys for no reason, and they did not bother to design a decent study. I guess you support Monkey Murder. |