From: Deadrat on
Kent Wills <compuelf(a)gmail.com> wrote in
news:ji4ik5hva1argfi03j3kfbahcvl2e1gr2u(a)4ax.com:

> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 01:43:59 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>http://www.examiner.com/x-27692-LA-County-Libertarian-Examiner~y2009m12
>>d23-Is-Florida-DCFS-aiming-to-steal-Tiger-Woods-children-Read-their-doc
>>ument-and-decide-yourself?cid=exrss-LA-County-Libertarian-Examiner
>>
>>Is Florida DCFS aiming to steal Tiger Wood's children?
>>Read their document and decide yourself!
>>
>>December 23, 4:56 AMLA County Libertarian Examiner Martin Hill
>>
>>Tiger Woods "African American" babies:
>
> How many people named Tiger Woods are they after?
> Note the author used plural.

Where? The phrase "Tiger Wood's children" uses an (incorrect) single
possessive. Incorrect because the man's name is Woods, not Wood. It
should be "Tiger Woods' children" or "Tiger Woods's children." If you
wanted to refer to the couple, you'd use the plural Woodses. The
possessive of that would be "Woodses'" or "Woodses's."

<snip/>
From: Greegor on
On Jan 9, 6:37 pm, Deadrat <a...(a)b.com> wrote:
> Where?  The phrase "Tiger Wood's children" uses an (incorrect) single
> possessive.  Incorrect because the man's name is Woods, not Wood.  It
> should be "Tiger Woods' children" or "Tiger Woods's children."  If you
> wanted to refer to the couple, you'd use the plural Woodses.  The
> possessive of that would be "Woodses'" or "Woodses's."

Thanks Dan.
From: Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS on
Don't worry. Tiger has the money to buy off the govt officials. The
rich always bribe their way out of everything.
From: Deadrat on
"Kent Wills" <compuelf(a)gmail.com> wrote in
news:hibv48$ipt$1(a)news.datemas.de:

>
> "Greegor" <greegor47(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:aa251549-45c6-4ed7-b531-994545000db0(a)e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com.
> .. On Jan 9, 6:37 pm, Deadrat <a...(a)b.com> wrote:
>>> Where? The phrase "Tiger Wood's children" uses an (incorrect) single
>>> possessive. Incorrect because the man's name is Woods, not Wood. It
>>> should be "Tiger Woods' children" or "Tiger Woods's children." If
>>> you wanted to refer to the couple, you'd use the plural Woodses. The
>>> possessive of that would be "Woodses'" or "Woodses's."
>>
>>Thanks Dan.
>
> Lay off the illegal drugs, Greg.
> Deadrat and Dan are not the same person, outside of your Fregoli.
>
<snip/>

I wondered about that. He thinks I'm somebody named Dan?

Thanks for Fregoli, though.


From: Greegor on
Is Florida DCFS aiming to steal Tiger Wood's children?
1 Greegor Jan 9
Greg can lie some more about Chairkool!
2 Kent Wills Jan 9
Re: Is Florida DCFS aiming to steal Tiger Wood's children?
3 Kent Wills Jan 9
4 Deadrat Jan 9
5 Greegor Jan 9
6 Kent Wills Jan 10
7 Deadrat Jan 10
8 Kent Wills Jan 10
9 Kent Wills Jan 10
10 Deadrat Jan 10
11 Kent Wills Jan 10
12 Deadrat Jan 10
13 Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS Jan 9


DR > Yeah, I know. I just couldn't help it. If it's any
DR > consolation, I'm beginning to annoy myself.

That's common among the misfits on usenet.