Is Florida DCFS aiming to steal Tiger Wood's children?
in [Adoption]
|
Prev: How can you NOT hire the a-team? According to ken pangborn he only lost 2 two cases out of 2,000!!!
Next: Nebraska ranks 4th in child-abuse death rate [ CPS was involved with most of them! ]
From: Deadrat on 9 Jan 2010 19:37 Kent Wills <compuelf(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:ji4ik5hva1argfi03j3kfbahcvl2e1gr2u(a)4ax.com: > On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 01:43:59 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>http://www.examiner.com/x-27692-LA-County-Libertarian-Examiner~y2009m12 >>d23-Is-Florida-DCFS-aiming-to-steal-Tiger-Woods-children-Read-their-doc >>ument-and-decide-yourself?cid=exrss-LA-County-Libertarian-Examiner >> >>Is Florida DCFS aiming to steal Tiger Wood's children? >>Read their document and decide yourself! >> >>December 23, 4:56 AMLA County Libertarian Examiner Martin Hill >> >>Tiger Woods "African American" babies: > > How many people named Tiger Woods are they after? > Note the author used plural. Where? The phrase "Tiger Wood's children" uses an (incorrect) single possessive. Incorrect because the man's name is Woods, not Wood. It should be "Tiger Woods' children" or "Tiger Woods's children." If you wanted to refer to the couple, you'd use the plural Woodses. The possessive of that would be "Woodses'" or "Woodses's." <snip/>
From: Greegor on 9 Jan 2010 20:02 On Jan 9, 6:37 pm, Deadrat <a...(a)b.com> wrote: > Where? The phrase "Tiger Wood's children" uses an (incorrect) single > possessive. Incorrect because the man's name is Woods, not Wood. It > should be "Tiger Woods' children" or "Tiger Woods's children." If you > wanted to refer to the couple, you'd use the plural Woodses. The > possessive of that would be "Woodses'" or "Woodses's." Thanks Dan.
From: Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS on 9 Jan 2010 21:41 Don't worry. Tiger has the money to buy off the govt officials. The rich always bribe their way out of everything.
From: Deadrat on 10 Jan 2010 02:52 "Kent Wills" <compuelf(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:hibv48$ipt$1(a)news.datemas.de: > > "Greegor" <greegor47(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:aa251549-45c6-4ed7-b531-994545000db0(a)e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com. > .. On Jan 9, 6:37 pm, Deadrat <a...(a)b.com> wrote: >>> Where? The phrase "Tiger Wood's children" uses an (incorrect) single >>> possessive. Incorrect because the man's name is Woods, not Wood. It >>> should be "Tiger Woods' children" or "Tiger Woods's children." If >>> you wanted to refer to the couple, you'd use the plural Woodses. The >>> possessive of that would be "Woodses'" or "Woodses's." >> >>Thanks Dan. > > Lay off the illegal drugs, Greg. > Deadrat and Dan are not the same person, outside of your Fregoli. > <snip/> I wondered about that. He thinks I'm somebody named Dan? Thanks for Fregoli, though.
From: Greegor on 10 Jan 2010 15:24
Is Florida DCFS aiming to steal Tiger Wood's children? 1 Greegor Jan 9 Greg can lie some more about Chairkool! 2 Kent Wills Jan 9 Re: Is Florida DCFS aiming to steal Tiger Wood's children? 3 Kent Wills Jan 9 4 Deadrat Jan 9 5 Greegor Jan 9 6 Kent Wills Jan 10 7 Deadrat Jan 10 8 Kent Wills Jan 10 9 Kent Wills Jan 10 10 Deadrat Jan 10 11 Kent Wills Jan 10 12 Deadrat Jan 10 13 Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS Jan 9 DR > Yeah, I know. I just couldn't help it. If it's any DR > consolation, I'm beginning to annoy myself. That's common among the misfits on usenet. |