Immunization Graphs:
in [Children]
|
Prev: Have you heard of the DiaPrevent diabetes research study?
Next: Jan Drew advertises for criminals like Hulda Clark on whose account go thousands of dead.
From: Steven Bornfeld on 27 Mar 2010 18:37 Mark Probert-Drew wrote: > On Mar 27, 10:04 am, Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldm...(a)dentaltwins.com> > wrote: >> Mark Probert wrote: >> >>> Great link. Solid real evidence. Unfortunately, the anti-vaxxers were >>> vaccinated against getting a clue, and it has been 100% effective. >>> Been to the Cyclones? >> Couple of times, not nearly enough. >> >> Steve > > Same here. I am glad that CI is going to be kept as a playground. The > Cyclones and a rejuvenated CI is a winner. Agreed. S.
From: john on 27 Mar 2010 19:08 "Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname(a)ratbags.com> wrote in message news:bb2sq514mjrt7k4ql2j4cllmtjmid1e0aq(a)4ax.com... > Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>Homeopathy & Measles quotes > > Thanks for that, Jan. I publish a "Batshit crazy anti-vax Quote of the > Day" on Twitter and Facebook, and that article has given me several > days' material. > Stick it next to your 20 lies http://whale.to/vaccine/real.html
From: D. C. Sessions on 8 Apr 2010 00:08
In message <jPmdnTIVEu9LPDfWnZ2dnUVZ8uidnZ2d(a)bt.com>, john wrote: > http://genesgreenbook.com/resources/obamsawin/ImmunizationGraphs-RO2009.pdf > > Figures one (1) through eleven (11) graphically illustrate that in North > America, Europe, and the South Pacific , major declines in life-threatening > infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance > of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed. This > provides irrefutable evidence that vaccines are not necessary for the > effective elimination of a wide range of infectious diseases > Figures eleven (12) through twenty-four (24) graphically illustrate > that immunization is not by any means a proven and foolproof measure for > protection from various infectious disease conditions. It is often > inconsequential epidemiologically, and in some cases it is shown to actually > worsen health-care outcomes. I love it when people flagrantly doctor the data to make up graphs. This is one of the best, since it cherry-picks a small number of dates to pull highs and lows of a varying list and then draws a straight line from long before measles vaccination to long after to pretend that there was a steady decline. Lovely example: http://genesgreenbook.com/content/proof-vaccines-didnt-save-us Now, isn't that an impressive decline from before vaccination? Only one problem -- a whole bunch of dates are deleted between 1935 and 1947 and between 1947 and 1959. Careful selection can be sooo useful, no? Here's the original graph: http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/measles-canada.jpg Now, isn't it curious that someone would go to this much trouble to lie about a subject? -- | The brighter the stupid burns, the more | | chance that someone will see the light. | +- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> -+ |