From: Mark Probert on
On Aug 7, 4:06 pm, pautrey <rpa20...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 12:40 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:25:31 -0500, in misc.health.alternative, David
>
> > <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >Bob Officer wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 07:45:11 -0500, in misc.kids.health, David
> > >> <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> carole wrote:
> > >>>> "Bob Officer" <boboffic...(a)127.0.0.7> wrote in message
> > >>>>news:vjnp56df6uqaf1rh15dbjje62nhk293eg4(a)4ax.com...
> > >>>>> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:49:03 -0700 (PDT), in misc.kids.health, Jan
> > >>>>> Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> On Aug 6, 8:27 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:11:33 -0700, in misc.health.alternative, "Peter
>
> > >>>>>>> B." <.@.> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> "carole" <hubbca2...(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>news:coO6o.2685$FH2.1508(a)viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
> > >>>>>>>>> "Peter B." <.@.> wrote in messagenews:4c5bab51(a)news.x-privat.org...
> > >>>>>>>>>> Yes, Google censors others in the U.S.A and prevents readers or
> > >>>>>>>>>> poster
> > >>>>>>>>>> from access to MHA because it does not meet Google's terms. Google
> > >>>>>>>>>> does
> > >>>>>>>>>> not control the Usenet. Who dies and left them ruler of the Usenet?
> > >>>>>>>>> Google isn't usenet ...mha isn't banned, just google version.
> > >>>>>>>>> I suppose we'll never know the real truth behind what actually broke
> > >>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> TOS rules --the spammer, Jan Drew with her naming and shaming, or
> > >>>>>>>>> others
> > >>>>>>>>> who bagged pharmaceuticals etc., other?
> > >>>>>>>>> Wait and see what happens with sci.med which is being heavily
> > >>>>>>>>> bombarded by
> > >>>>>>>>> the spammer at the moment.
> > >>>>>>>>> carole
> > >>>>>>>> Google has Google groups and then they carry the Usenet. They do make a
> > >>>>>>>> distinction but in this case they are attempting to treat it a one of
> > >>>>>>>> their
> > >>>>>>>> groups, which it isn't. They try very hard to control a free enterprise
> > >>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>> there is your money connection. If they keep on acting as they do then
> > >>>>>>>> anything you read on Usenet, especially via their reader they have just
> > >>>>>>>> assumed authority and responsibility for it. Never before could you sue
> > >>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>> server service and win, free speech and all that, but now it seems that
> > >>>>>>>> Google wants to pay you for your suffering.
> > >>>>>>>> While Janet did not have a whole lot of money, Gt_gle does. Janet
> > >>>>>>>> listed
> > >>>>>>>> "the gang", now "the gan j can start talks with Google? Who knows, but
> > >>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>> is the direction they are headed. They con\d have simply dropped the
> > >>>>>>>> group
> > >>>>>>>> like any Usenet server for no reason, but they did not. ;)
> > >>>>>>> Jan was so nice she when to another group and posted her ïØst. What  >>>>> she did was 0Qve the complainant even more evidence against google
> > >>>>>>> and their abuser.
> > >>>>>> Google Censors Usenet Group 8/05/2010 It banned
> > >>>>>> misc.health.alternative from all its users.
>
> > >>>>>> Thanks for showing your dishonest.
> > >>>>> The only people censored were abusers like you, rpautrey and Andy
> > >>>>> Chung, Jan. No one else is not posting.
> > >>>> Yes, its so wonderful over here ...weather's beautiful.
>
> > >>>>> Sucks big time to be you.
> > >>>> Be nice.
> > >>>> You know, I don't think that Jan's really gone at all ...not when we have
> > >>>> the benefit of cross-posting.
> > >>>> Hi Jan!
>
> > >>>> carole
> > >>>>www.conspiracee.com
>
> > >>>>> BTW Google was notified of your abuse in this group as well.
>
> > >>>>> IT won't be here long and it too will be gone.
>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Ak'toh'di
>
> > >>>  So... It looks like the injun knows a lot about this. Hmmm..... Whiny
> > >>> tattletales are commonly beat up in school.
>
> > >> David, you show you bigotry and your cowardice all in one little
> > >> line.
>
> > >  You are the one who posted some Indian stuff.
>
> > Some "indian stuff", you mean my name?
>
> > >As a way to garner respect?
>
> > So using my name is a way to gain respect, in your book?
>
> > >Seems that is a creative use of bigotry. I don't respect people
> > >for their ancestry, and I hope for a day when people can get over their
> > >   immature clinging to their race, wealth, number of kills as a
> > >worthiness gauge. And believing that they have the answers to everything.
>
> > I don't have the answer to everything. I happen to be proud of my
> > heritages, both the white and the red.
>
> > Do not mistake pride for bigotry.
>
> > The Name  is a translated to one that sees. I see you, coward and
> > bigot.
>
> > --
> > Bob Officer
> > Posting the truthhttp://www.skeptics.com.au
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
>
> Crybaby,
>
> You're a Heinz 57 just as I am (Cherokee 1/16, Choctaw 1/16, French,
> Irish, Scotch).

I prefer A-1.


> I would bet I am far more sympathetic towards native american causes
> and know far
> more about native culture than you do. Put that in your spoon and sip
> it.