From: Jeff on
Mark Probert wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
>> Kevysmom wrote:
>>> When Mark Probert starts calling people names, Its because he has
>>> nothing intelligent to say!
>>>
>>> Poor Mark...... I cant wait for Mr Moore to expose you rat bags!
>>
>> I disagree. When Mark calls people names, it seems to be out of
>> frustration. However, it does hurt his message. I wish he would grow
>> up and stop doing it.
>
> I call names when people leave facts behind and start playing their
> moronic word games, selectively edit to promote their agendas, or come
> out with the conspiracy bullshit. They do not deserve better than that.

Wrong. The behavior you show reflects on you, not the person to whom you
are responding. The behavior makes you look ignorant.

And you're also wrong about the person deserving the response.

And, I can figure out myself whether or not the person responding has
anything worthwhile to say without anyone's personal attacks or
kindergarten-like behavior.

Jeff

> I'll stick to facts when anyone uses them.
From: Kevysmom on
On May 24, 9:09 am, Jeff <kidsdoc2...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> > Jeff wrote:
> >> Kevysmom wrote:
> >>> When Mark Probert starts calling people names, Its because he has
> >>> nothing intelligent to say!
>
> >>> Poor Mark...... I cant wait for Mr Moore to expose you rat bags!
>
> >> I disagree. When Mark calls people names, it seems to be out of
> >> frustration. However, it does hurt his message. I wish he would grow
> >> up and stop doing it.
>
> > I call names when people leave facts behind and start playing their
> > moronic word games, selectively edit to promote their agendas, or come
> > out with the conspiracy bullshit. They do not deserve better than that.
>
> Wrong. The behavior you show reflects on you, not the person to whom you
> are responding. The behavior makes you look ignorant.
>
> And you're also wrong about the person deserving the response.
>
> And, I can figure out myself whether or not the person responding has
> anything worthwhile to say without anyone's personal attacks or
> kindergarten-like behavior.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> > I'll stick to facts when anyone uses them.- Hide quoted text -
>


Thank You Jeff. You have always posted in a kind reasonable way.
Great
debating skills you have!




From: Kevysmom on
On May 24, 9:35 am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
> Kevysmom <bluebun...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Poor David, King of the Rat Bags!
>
> >> I just saw someone complaining about Mark calling people names.
>
> >> Pot, meet kettle.
>
> >LOL, No Jeff! David is part of the ratbags. Isnt that the name of
> >thier web site??
>
> No. It is the name of my web site.
>


And so be it, Rat Bags "R" You! And all of your so called friends who
follow your agenda!


From: Mark Probert on
Jeff wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
>> Jeff wrote:
>>> Kevysmom wrote:
>>>> When Mark Probert starts calling people names, Its because he has
>>>> nothing intelligent to say!
>>>>
>>>> Poor Mark...... I cant wait for Mr Moore to expose you rat bags!
>>>
>>> I disagree. When Mark calls people names, it seems to be out of
>>> frustration. However, it does hurt his message. I wish he would grow
>>> up and stop doing it.
>>
>> I call names when people leave facts behind and start playing their
>> moronic word games, selectively edit to promote their agendas, or come
>> out with the conspiracy bullshit. They do not deserve better than that.
>
> Wrong. The behavior you show reflects on you, not the person to whom you
> are responding. The behavior makes you look ignorant.
>
> And you're also wrong about the person deserving the response.

Disagree. What I write is about those who would prefer stacks of dead
children, and they deserve nothing better.

> And, I can figure out myself whether or not the person responding has
> anything worthwhile to say without anyone's personal attacks or
> kindergarten-like behavior.

AFAIAC, you are free to do and conclude as you wish. Those who I detest
would not agree. They would prefer to silence you.

>
> Jeff
>
>> I'll stick to facts when anyone uses them.
From: Mark Probert on
Kevysmom wrote:
>>> Poor David, King of the Rat Bags!
>> I just saw someone complaining about Mark calling people names.
>>
>> Pot, meet kettle.
>
> LOL, No Jeff! David is part of the ratbags. Isnt that the name of
> thier web site??

No. Why would you think that (rhetorical question)? I suspect that you
think that as you see an opportunity to dismiss the opinions of those
who provide facts to refute your bullshit.

Like David pointed out, it was a joke,intended to tweak the conspiracy
wackos and provide some amusement to those who use facts.

Furthermore, Peter Bowditch is Australian, and do you have any idea what
ratbags means in Australian?

>> While David and I are usually right on a subject (i.e., if he agrees
>> with me, he is probably right), I am on no pharmashill squad.
>
> Oh, Brother talk about being modest! Im sorry Jeff, I see you as one
> of the Pharma Shills! So that makes you part of the pharmashill squad!

I thought you did not approve of name calling? H Y P O C R I T I C A L
of you to resort to pharmashill....

>> At least he doesn't resort to name calling.
>>
>> I won't say that David is wise, either. But he is able to come to better
>> conclusions that you.
>
>
> Again, I have only called him what they call each other. RatBags.
> Thats the name of thier website! Havent you looked at thier website
> after all these years?
>
> I come to the conclussion based on facts, Not Fiction!

You came to that conclusion by reading something and not understanding it.

>