From: Peter B. on
"Jan Drew" <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:6dd8f90a-87fe-4e4f-b6fd-10b7cf251c17(a)b18g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On May 2, 8:23?am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> Kevysmom wrote:
> >> You now know the reason that most people in America (including myself)
> >> do
> >> NOT waste our time watching PBS shows. PBS has to rely mainly on the
> >> gov't
> >> for funding. They do collect donations but as far as I know--most of
> >> their
> >> funding comes from the government. If it was not for gov't funding, PBS
> >> would have gone out of business many years ago. Most all of their
> >> producers and directors are very liberal
>
> > Major funding for PBS is from tax payers donating moent to the
> > government by force, Then the government forces parents to vaccinate
> > their babies,
>
> No one forces anyone to be vaccinated.

A blatant lie.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/WaterCooler/story?id=3880578&page=1

http://www.halexandria.org/dward054.htm
>
> > The babies become severely injured or die,
>
> Actually, that very rarely happens. What also very rarely happens is
> that people get serious problems or die from vaccine-preventable
> diseases like measles, mumps, rubella, chicken-pox, tetanus, Hib
> menigitis and pneumonia. That amounts to thousands of lives saved a year.
>
> > The parents
> > cant sue the pharmectutical company, it has to sue the government
>
> Good! Unfortunately, juries tend to find for the families, regardless of
> the facts, because drug companies are perceived to have deep pockets and
> feel sorry for the kids.
>
> > Oh, and Eli Lilly is the maker of thimerosal(Mercury that was/is being
> > injected into newborn babies and pregnant women)
>
> Was. Thimerosal is no long in childhood vaccines. In the very small
> doses that were used, thimerosal has never been shown to be harmful. In
> fact, kids get more mercury, in a more harmful form (methylmercury) from
> eating fish. In addition, after thimerosal was removed from vaccines, no
> reduction in diseases that were conjectured to be caused by vaccines was
> seen.
>
> Jeff

Another blatant lie.
================================================
Prove it!


From: Jan Drew on
On May 2, 7:11�pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
> "Peter B." <.@.> wrote:
> >Chicken-pox is a blessing, and so is measles and polio compared to a
> >severe vaccine injury
>
> Just posted to Twitter as my Batshit Crazy Anti-vax Quote of the Day.
>
> --
> Peter Bowditch aa #2243
> The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
> Australian Council Against Health Fraudhttp://www.acahf.org.au
> To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
> I'm @RatbagsDotCom on Twitter

Anybody who uses Twitter is a fool.
From: Peter B. on
"Jan Drew" <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:7ecf8837-a7dc-4dc8-8b50-6abb3291b2a3(a)o11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
On May 1, 11:13 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 1, 3:49 am, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
>
> > Dr. Rashid Buttar (who was interviewed for 'Vaccine Wars' but never seen
> > on
> > program) speaks out:
>
> Another quack-a-doodle who chelates kids. Recently disciplined by his
> state medical board.
>
> Awww...boohoo...wah, wah...sniff...

Grow up Mark.
===============================================
GS


From: Jan Drew on
On May 2, 8:01�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 2, 8:41�am, Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 1, 11:17�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 1, 2:56�pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > And wouldn't supporting vaccines and the drug industry, as in this case,
> > > > > be supporting a conservative bias, not a liberal one?
>
> > > > > Jeff
>
> > > > WHY didnt PBS show films of vaccine injured babies in the PICU
> > > > fighting for life? They didnt show one vaccine injured baby, WHY?
>
> > > Good question....hmmm./.I KNOW!
>
> > > Vaccine injured babies do not exist.
>
> > MARK!!!!!!!! That is the lamest and cruelest thing Ive ever seen you
> > write. Yes, its cruel you knowing very well that vaccines do injury
> > babies and actually cause death in babies, so AGAIN why didnt PBS show
> > the infants in PICU suffering, yet they showed a baby with measles?
> > Thats not being fair and balanced in journalism. Its using FEAR to get
> > young parents to keep BLINDLY vaccinating their newborn babies with
> > toxins
>
> > > > Are they scared parents would rather their child have the damn measles
> > > > than take a risk of having a dead or severely disabled child from
> > > > injecting toxins into their baby?
>
> > > > Interesting
>
> > > >http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/
>
> > > > PBS show Religion and Ethics is funded by Eli Lilly makers of
> > > > thimerosal
>
> > > > Funding
> > > > Funding for RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY is provided by Lilly
> > > > Endowment Inc. with additional support from the Corporation for Public
> > > > Broadcasting and Mutual of America Life Insurance Company.
> > > > �The Indianapolis-based Lilly Endowment Inc. was founded in 1937 by
> > > > three members of the Lilly family through gifts of stock in their
> > > > pharmaceutical business, Eli Lilly and Company. The Endowment is a
> > > > separate entity from the company, with a distinct governing board,
> > > > staff and location, and is devoted to the causes of religion,
> > > > education and community development.
>
> > > Do you know the meaning of distinct?
>
> > > I am on the board of an endowment, and we are totally independent of
> > > everything.
>
> > And I own the Brooklyn Bridge!
>
> Nope. I co-chair a special scholarship committee to help kids who have
> potential to succeed at school, but, for reasons beyond their control,
> did not do well in high school. We had a kid this year who the
> principal insisted did not deserve an award, but, we did it anyway,
> simply because the kid showed potential and his problems were not
> within his control.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/b47238df12888f43

Anecdotes are not facts. They are, at best interesting stories. At
worst, outright lies.
From: Jan Drew on
On May 2, 8:45�pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> Steven Bornfeld wrote:
> > Jason wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <0b3c12a7-8b8c-477f-ba80-f1163fc89...(a)i9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, Mark
> >> Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On May 1, 8:12=A0pm, Ja...(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >>>> In article <ZZednbMOtJFkxEHWnZ2dnUVZ_tydn...(a)giganews.com>,
> >>>> u...(a)msu.edu =
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> Jason wrote:
> >>>>> <...>
> >>>>>> You now know the reason that most people in America (including
> >>>>>> myself=
> >>> ) do
> >>>>>> NOT waste our time watching PBS shows.
> >>>>> Many people choose not to be informed, too.
> >>>>>> PBS has to rely mainly on the gov't
> >>>>>> for funding.
> >>>>> About 40 to 45% of their funding comes from federal and state sources.
> >>>>>> They do collect donations but as far as I know--most of their
> >>>>>> funding comes from the government. If it was not for gov't
> >>>>>> funding, P=
> >>> BS
> >>>>>> would have gone out of business many years ago. Most all of their
> >>>>>> producers and directors are very liberal.
> >>>>> Prove that the news that they report has a liberal bias.
> >>>>> And wouldn't supporting vaccines and the drug industry, as in this
> >>>>> case=
> >>> ,
> >>>>> be supporting a conservative bias, not a liberal one?
> >>>>> Jeff
> >>>> Jeff,
> >>>> I do not expect liberals or socialists to even be aware when they
> >>>> watch a
> >>>> news show on PBS or CNN that they are watching news shows that have a
> >>>> liberal bias. Just about the only people that can recognize liberal
> >>>> bias
> >>>> on a PBS or CNN news show are conservatives. Liberals are probably
> >>>> able t=
> >>> o
> >>>> notice bias when they watch a news show on the Fox news channel.
> >>>> jason-
> >>> This is not a liberal-conservative issue. Some very conservative right
> >>> wingers just made major fools of themselves on this issue.
>
> >> Liberalism is a mental disorder.
>
> > Are most alt. health people right wingers? �It's not intuitive to me.
>
> > Steve (mostly lefty)
>
> Actually, most alt. health people are unable to determine good data from
> bad. Alternative health is, by definition, unproven. Once it is proven,
> it is considered part of mainstream medicine. Another name for
> alternative medicine is con-med or conjecture-based medicine.
>
> Jeff

Blatant liar.

Results 1 - 10 of about 2,690,000 for The number of alternative and
holistic schools in the US. (0.24 seconds

The proper name is alternative and complimentary medicine.
You would do well to look all them up. But, you probablhy won't
because you believe the lies of Organizaed medicine

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Prev: A grade of D
Next: Jeff Utz is not a doctor