From: Citizen Jimserac on
On May 10, 3:53 am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:

Bowdie... - there must be 3 or 4 (or is it 5 or 6, or is it 1 or 2
PRETENDING to be 4 or 5??) respondents attacking, insulting, demeaning
and otherwise harrassing Jan Drew.

THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR MONTHS.

Do you REALLY want to be a part of this?

And, IF, in your opinion, the other side is engaging in those tactics,
do you REALLY want to adapt the same tactics??

Drew has made specific and factual submissions, many of which are
controversial.

Instead of the personal attacks, why not just objectively deal with
the links and disprove them?

The sceptics claim to be all about science, reasoning and evidence.

Prove it. Do it.

Citizen Jimserac





From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 10, 10:10 am, Citizen Jimserac <jimse...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 3:53 am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
>
> Bowdie...  - there must be 3 or 4 (or is it 5 or 6, or is it 1 or 2
> PRETENDING to be 4 or 5??) respondents attacking, insulting, demeaning
> and otherwise harrassing Jan Drew.

You have the backwards. DREW has been offered peace by me numerous
times. I had left her alone for three years.

She continued her stalking, harassing and abuse of me, my family, my
religion and my business.

If she were to give me peace, i.e. just leave me alone, not respond to
me, not to mention me, I am ABSOLUTELY certain that she would receive
back peace.

Right now she attacks Jeff Utz, me, Bob Officer, et al, anyone who
disagrees with her. She brings to herself what she dishes out.

> THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR MONTHS.
>
> Do you REALLY want to be a part of this?
>
> And, IF, in your opinion, the other side is engaging in those tactics,
> do you REALLY want to adapt the same tactics??
>
> Drew has made specific and factual submissions, many of which are
> controversial.
>
> Instead of the personal attacks, why not just objectively deal with
> the links and disprove them?

Because with her, the personal attack is always just one message away.
That is what she does all the time.

> The sceptics claim to be all about science, reasoning and evidence.
>
> Prove it.  Do it.

DREW can do it all by herself. She knows how.

She won't.
From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <Jason-0505102311210001(a)66-53-223-173.stkn.mdsg-pacwest.com>, Jason wrote:

> I have read that they have
> removed mercury from all vaccines in Europe. They must have had good
> reasons for making that decision.

Yes: the mistaken notion that by pulling the thimerosal they
would appease the antivaxx set and ensure higher vaccination
rates.

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> -+
From: Jan Drew on
On May 10, 10:04�am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 3:53�am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
>
> > Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > >Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of
> > >health declared, "the only safe vaccine is one that is never used."
>
> > When did he say that, Jan, and in what context?
>
> > As usual, your own words please.
>
> I have looked for the context of that quote several times, and cannot
> find it. I doubt it is a quote, and believe that it is something that
> has been adulterated after being quote mined and taken out of
> context.

Shows your poor skills.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james.htm
From: Jan Drew on
On May 10, 10:25�am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 10:10�am, Citizen Jimserac <jimse...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 10, 3:53�am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:

On May 10, 3:53 am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
> Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of
> >health declared, "the only safe vaccine is one that is never used."
>
> When did he say that, Jan, and in what context?

>
> > Bowdie... �- there must be 3 or 4 (or is it 5 or 6, or is it 1 or 2
> > PRETENDING to be 4 or 5??) respondents attacking, insulting, demeaning
> > and otherwise harrassing Jan Drew.
>
> You have the backwards. DREW


Is not the subject.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
Prev: A grade of D
Next: Jeff Utz is not a doctor