From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <024dd502-2671-4b4b-8a97-c0b1499828b8(a)z33g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, Mark Probert wrote:

> However, what the baby has is a very robust immune system. The baby
> has hundreds, if not thousands "assaults" a day and handles them.

You're undercounting by several orders of magnitude. Even in terms
of novel-to-the-infant antigens the number is still way up there
at one year.

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> -+
From: Steelclaws on
On May 7, 12:10 pm, Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > Your statement does not make any sense.
>
> > As usual...
>
> It makes perfect sense to me!

LOL - given what makes sense to you, that kinda figures...
From: Peter Bowditch on
Donna <kevysmom10(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>So, are you saying some can ingest poison chemicals and not have a
>reaction, while others can die from it? You dont make any sense.

The chemical most commonly used for suicide attempts in Australia is
acetaminophen. If this chemical was invented today it would probably
not be allowed to be sold without a prescription from a doctor because
of its toxicity to the liver, but right now a lethal dose can be
purchased in supermarkets for a few dollars.

The reaction that most people have to the millions of doses consumed
around the world each day is that their headaches and other pains go
away.

The dose makes the poison.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
I'm @RatbagsDotCom on Twitter
From: Peter Bowditch on
dr_jeff <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote:

>Happy Oyster wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 May 2010 06:13:28 +0100, "john" <nospam(a)bt.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The brighter the stupid burns, the more chance
>>> that someone will see the light.
>>
>> The anti-vaccination morons never are bright. The even do not shine bright, when
>> roasting their behind, like John Scudamore... ;O)
>
>That's not true. People can be true believers and blind to evidence and
>facts. These people can be bright.

As an example, Professor Boyd Haley could not have climbed to head of
the school of chemistry at the University of Kentucky if he was a
dullard. Other examples are the creationists Michael Behe and William
Dembski. All of these people are hopelessly wrong but all of them are
bright.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
I'm @RatbagsDotCom on Twitter
From: Mark Probert on
On May 7, 6:24 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
> Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >So, are you saying some can ingest poison chemicals and not have a
> >reaction, while others can die from it? You dont make any sense.
>
> The chemical most commonly used for suicide attempts in Australia is
> acetaminophen. If this chemical was invented today it would probably
> not be allowed to be sold without a prescription from a doctor because
> of its toxicity to the liver, but right now a lethal dose can be
> purchased in supermarkets for a few dollars.
>
> The reaction that most people have to the millions of doses consumed
> around the world each day is that their headaches and other pains go
> away.
>
> The dose makes the poison.

Interestingly, APAP has one of the narrowest margines between the
therapuetic dose and the toxic dose.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
Prev: A grade of D
Next: Jeff Utz is not a doctor