From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <Jason-0505101753490001(a)66-53-210-123.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>, Jason wrote:

> I do have a problem with
> any vaccine that contains mercury since mercury is poison and is a
> neurotoxin.

So is sodium hydroxide. What are you doing to eliminate it from
your body?

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> -+
From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <a94f48ef-72b4-4f90-b7eb-aa388dc027b6(a)b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, Donna wrote:

> But, there is proof that thimerosal is a neutoxin, it destroys DNA!

So does distilled water. What are you going to do to avoid damage
from that source?

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> -+
From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <dc243d40-f901-4fab-8c4e-f53c59c2f1d5(a)b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, Donna wrote:

> But, we dont know for sure that thimerosal doesnt cause autism,

We don't know for sure that storks don't cause babies, either.
But that's the way the smart money bets.

> We do
> know that it causes severe brain damage and even death

And yet, interestingly, when mercury compounds were put into
so much stuff that kids all over the USA were coming down with
pink disease, somehow there was no spike in autism. Isn't
that amazing?

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> -+
From: D. C. Sessions on
In message <79ednSHgXvMTuX_WnZ2dnUVZ_uwAAAAA(a)giganews.com>, dr_jeff wrote:

> That's because you're asking a stupid question. The proper question is
> at the doses that were used, is thimerosal dangerous? The answer is no.

Not quite. The question is, "at the doses in question, what is the
upper bound on the toxicity of the chemical in question which is
consistent with the data?"

A large part of the problem comes from trying to create a black/white
distinction between "safe" and "dangerous." IMHO once you get the
risk down below that of taking a child with you to visit Grandma you're
down into "acceptable risk" country.

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> -+
From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 5, 9:05 pm, Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 5, 7:51 pm, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 8:53 pm, Ja...(a)nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > In article <sImdnUMDLvooaHzWnZ2dnUVZ_roAA...(a)giganews.com>, u...(a)msu.edu wrote:
> > > > Jason wrote:
>
> > > > <...>
>
> > > > > Jeff,
> > > > > Why are you an advocate for a known poison that is also a known
> > > > > neurotoxin?
>
> > > > No, I am not. I am an advocate for vaccination, which save lives. While
> > > > I am glad that thimerasol has been removed from most vaccines, there is
> > > > no evidence that the chemical poses a risk at the very small doses used.
> > > > And, there is no evidence that vaccines cause autism, as some suggest.
>
> > > > > You remind me of the people that are advocates for tobacco. Do
> > > > > you work for a drug company that sells vaccines that contain mercury?
>
> > > > No, I work for no drug company. What I say is my own opinion, not those
> > > > of any company.
>
> > > > Jeff
>
> > > Jeff,
> > > Thanks for answering my questions. I don't have problems with mercury free
> > > vaccines that have been properly tested. The vaccine for swine flu was NOT
> > > properly tested so I did NOT get that vaccine.
>
> > Sure it was. It was manufactured in exactly the same manner as all
> > previous flu vaccines, and underwent testing.
>
> > I do have a problem with
>
> > > any vaccine that contains mercury since mercury is poison and is a
> > > neurotoxin.
>
> > However, dose is what is important, and the dose used is miniscule. It
> > is not toxic at the dose used.
>
> > When even small amount of a neurotoxin is injected into a
>
> > > child, it is like playing with fire. Children (esp. babies) do not have
> > > fully developed immune system.
>
> > The immune system of babies is just fine. They are dealing with
> > hundreds, if not thousands, of antigens each day.
>
> > It's for that reason, neurotoxins--even in
>
> > > small doses--should not be given to children. At the very least, doctors
> > > or nurses should test children to determine if they have an allergic
> > > reaction to mercury.
>
> > Mercury allergy is extraordinarily rare.
>
> I cant believe you just wrote that, Mercury is more toxic than LEAD,
> or Aresnic
>
> Just one drop seeped through a scientist glove caused death

I do not believe you. Prove it. Make sure it is verifiable.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
Prev: A grade of D
Next: Jeff Utz is not a doctor