From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 4, 10:38 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On May 3, 11:44 pm, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...(a)ariplex.com> wrote:
>  .
>
>
>
> > Janet Mae Drew, the wimp,
>
>  How infantile

You are a DREWing hypocrite. You call Bob Officer, and me, the same
thing.

YOU are infantile.

From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 4, 10:44 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On May 4, 11:02 am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 12:40 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 3, 9:59 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 2, 11:19 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 1, 11:17 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 1, 2:56 pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > And wouldn't supporting vaccines and the drug industry, as in this case,
> > > > > > > > be supporting a conservative bias, not a liberal one?
>
> > > > > > > > Jeff
>
> > > > > > > WHY didnt PBS show films of vaccine injured babies in the PICU
> > > > > > > fighting for life? They didnt show one vaccine injured baby, WHY?
>
> > > > > > Good question....hmmm./.I KNOW!
>
> > > > > > Vaccine injured babies do not exist.
>
> > > > > > > Are they scared parents would rather their child have the damn measles
> > > > > > > than take a risk of having a dead or severely disabled child from
> > > > > > > injecting toxins into their baby?
>
> > > > > > > Interesting
>
> > > > > > >http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/
>
> > > > > > > PBS show Religion and Ethics is funded by Eli Lilly makers of
> > > > > > > thimerosal
>
> > > > > > > Funding
> > > > > > > Funding for RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY is provided by Lilly
> > > > > > > Endowment Inc. with additional support from the Corporation for Public
> > > > > > > Broadcasting and Mutual of America Life Insurance Company.
> > > > > > > The Indianapolis-based Lilly Endowment Inc. was founded in 1937 by
> > > > > > > three members of the Lilly family through gifts of stock in their
> > > > > > > pharmaceutical business, Eli Lilly and Company. The Endowment is a
> > > > > > > separate entity from the company, with a distinct governing board,
> > > > > > > staff and location, and is devoted to the causes of religion,
> > > > > > > education and community development.
>
> > > > > > Do you know the meaning of distinct?
>
> > > > > > I am on the board of an endowment, and we are totally independent of
> > > > > > everything.
>
> > > > > Now, there is a claim for you to prove.
>
> > > > Up your DREWhole. For me to prove that would encourage more of your
> > > > stalking. Go DREW yourself.
>
> > > > You have forgotten what you
>
> > > > > posted:
>
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/b47238df1...
>
> > > > > ****Anecdotes are not facts. They are, at best interesting stories.
> > > > > At
> > > > > worst, outright lies.****
>
> > You have taken that out of context (a form of lying). Anecdotes do not
> > prove scientific issues. Period.
>
> It is you who lie. Period.

You are so stupid you do not understand simple written discourse.

> You also posted nothing I posted was interesting.  Yet, you keep
> replying.

Because you need to be told how stupid you are.

> You cannot help yourself.  Get help with your insane need to argue.

I have no need like that. YOU do. You are psychotic.
>
>
>
> > I have told you this
> > 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.3
> > times and you have not learned it.
>
> Now, now, Mark do show that many times where you told me that.

You really are stupid.

> > As for me proving anything, especially to a DREWbag like yourself, go
> > shove it up your DREWhole
>
> Keep proving you lied when you posted I read Torah everyday.-

Everyone knows that you do not read Torah at all. When Torah comes out
in comic book form, you will just look at the pictures, and, even
then, get it wrong.
From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 4, 10:48 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On May 4, 11:05 am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 6:17 am, Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 3, 7:45 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > > > Donna wrote:
> > > > > On May 2, 10:56 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > > > >> Jason wrote:
> > > > >>> In article
> > > > >>> <5d3aede3-1dd6-4d2e-8147-3d6abd17a...(a)o1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>, Mark
> > > > >>> Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>> On May 2, 8:41=A0am, Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>> On May 1, 11:17=A0pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> On May 1, 2:56=A0pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>> And wouldn't supporting vaccines and the drug industry, as in this =
> > > > >>>> case,
> > > > >>>>>>>> be supporting a conservative bias, not a liberal one?
> > > > >>>>>>>> Jeff
> > > > >>>>>>> WHY didnt PBS show films of vaccine injured babies in the PICU
> > > > >>>>>>> fighting for life? They didnt show one vaccine injured baby, WHY?
> > > > >>>>>> Good question....hmmm./.I KNOW!
> > > > >>>>>> Vaccine injured babies do not exist.
> > > > >>>>> MARK!!!!!!!! That is the lamest and cruelest thing Ive ever seen you
> > > > >>>>> write. Yes, its cruel you knowing very well that vaccines do injury
> > > > >>>>> babies and actually cause death in babies, so AGAIN why didnt PBS show
> > > > >>>>> the infants in PICU suffering, yet they showed a baby with measles?
> > > > >>>> I would have preferred an hour long show of the consequences of not
> > > > >>>> vaccinating. A nice tour of an iron lung ward, rehab centers where 15
> > > > >>>> year old children babble because of meningitis destroying their
> > > > >>>> brains, children wearing hearing aids, blue babies trying to breath
> > > > >>>> inspite of their diptheria, and things like that.
> > > > >>>>> Thats not being fair and balanced in journalism.
> > > > >>>> There are issues that are subject to fair and balanced. Those subjects
> > > > >>>> have two valid sides. In the issue of vaccination, there is only one
> > > > >>>> valid side.
> > > > >>>> Its using FEAR to get
> > > > >>>>> young parents to keep BLINDLY vaccinating their newborn babies with
> > > > >>>>> toxins
> > > > >>>> You whine about fear? Both sides use fear. The difference is that the
> > > > >>>> fear of these diseases is valid. The "fear" of vaccines is bullshit.
> > > > >>> The reality is that millions of people do fear vaccines. Have you ever
> > > > >>> seen any children that had autism? Believe it or not, most parents FEAR
> > > > >>> that their children will develop autism if their children get dozens of
> > > > >>> shots that contain mercury.
> > > > >> Vaccines don't have mercury.
>
> > > > > False!!
>
> > > > >>> As you probably know, mercury is a known
> > > > >>> poison. There are known effects of mercury poisoning. I once saw a list of
> > > > >>> the known effects of mercury poisoning and compared it with a list of the
> > > > >>> symptoms of children that have autism and many of the things on both lists
> > > > >>> were similar.
> > > > >> Only superficially. When you look more closely at the symptoms of the
> > > > >> two, they are not that similar. Autism causes specific changes in the
> > > > >> brain. Mercury causes *different* changes in the brain.
>
> > > > > This is true, known cases of mercury poisoning cause microcephaly not
> > > > > macrocephaly, BUT, how do we know its not possible that mercury can
> > > > > have this effect on a babies brain development? Do you have scientific
> > > > > studies proving mercury doesnt cause macrocephaly? Does smoking only
> > > > > cause lung cancer?
>
> > > > Below, you say you did lots of research. You tell us.
>
> > > > >>> If you seen that evidence, you would probably say that it
> > > > >>> was just a coincidence that the two lists were similar. However, millions
> > > > >>> of people now believe that it is not a coincidence that the lists are
> > > > >>> similar or in some cases identical.
> > > > >> Believe is the key word. Fact is that autism is *not* caused by mercury
> > > > >> or vaccines.
>
> > > > >> Jeff
>
> > > > > I think Autism is caused by mercury, from observation and from tons of
> > > > > research. Sure, its not as severe as congenital mercury poisoning,
> > > > > But, I feel children with Autism are the way they are because of heavy
> > > > > metals causing damage to a childs brain.
>
> > > > Your research isn't very good then. After mercury was removed from
> > > > vaccines, autism rates didn't go down. Nor do epidemiological studies
> > > > support your conjecture.
>
> > > According to the EPA 1 out of 6 women of child bearing age has enough
> > > mercury in her body to cause harm to her fetus. Vaccines are NOT the
> > > only source of mercury
>
> > > Now, is this just a coincidence that according to the EPA 1 out of 6
> > > women of child bearing age has enough mercury in her body to cause
> > > harm to her fetus, and according to the CDC 1 out of 6 children have a
> > > developmental problem..... Mercury is a NEUROTOXIN, it does more
> > > damage than lead, now if 1 out of 6 women of child bearing age had
> > > enough lead in their bodies to cause harm to her fetus, would you than
> > > be alarmed?
>
> > The operative word is *IF*. Recently, a study by the EPA was entirely
> > misquoted and misused by anti-vaccinationist.
>
> > Provide the actual study.
>
> Like you provide the proof of your claims.

When appropriate, I do.

> Poor Mark S Probert who does not back up his claims.-

You back up your DREWhole.

From: Jason on

> > This is true, known cases of mercury poisoning cause microcephaly not
> > macrocephaly, BUT, how do we know its not possible that mercury can
> > have this effect on a babies brain development? Do you have scientific
> > studies proving mercury doesnt cause macrocephaly? Does smoking only
> > cause lung cancer?
>
> Below, you say you did lots of research. You tell us.
>
> >>> If you seen that evidence, you would probably say that it
> >>> was just a coincidence that the two lists were similar. However, millions
> >>> of people now believe that it is not a coincidence that the lists are
> >>> similar or in some cases identical.
> >> Believe is the key word. Fact is that autism is *not* caused by mercury
> >> or vaccines.
> >>
> >> Jeff
>
> >
> >
> > I think Autism is caused by mercury, from observation and from tons of
> > research. Sure, its not as severe as congenital mercury poisoning,
> > But, I feel children with Autism are the way they are because of heavy
> > metals causing damage to a childs brain.
>
> Your research isn't very good then. After mercury was removed from
> vaccines, autism rates didn't go down. Nor do epidemiological studies
> support your conjecture.


That's a good point. However, vaccines are NOT the only source of mercury
poisoning. For example, fish also contains mercury. If ALL mercury was
removed from vaccines, children would still develop autism if they ate
fish that contained mercury. However, it's the opinion of lots of experts
that less children would develop autism since not all children eat fish
that contain mercury and many children may NEVER be exposed to mercury.
Almost everyone knows people that are lactose intolerant. There are some
experts that believe that some children are mercury intolerant. In other
words, they develop a reaction to mercury and that reaction could be
autism. I have read that there is a test that doctors can conduct to
determine if a child has an allergic reaction to mercury. I don't know the
reason why the children that have autism are not tested to determine if
they have an allergic reaction to mercury.


From: john on

"D. C. Sessions" <dcs(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote in message ?
>
>> find me one person damaged by a witch in this country
>
> What, you won't take the word of parents regarding the harm
> done to their children?
>

yes, lets see them then


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Prev: A grade of D
Next: Jeff Utz is not a doctor