From: Jan Drew on
On May 4, 11:02�am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 4, 12:40�am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 3, 9:59 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 2, 11:19 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 1, 11:17 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 1, 2:56 pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > And wouldn't supporting vaccines and the drug industry, as in this case,
> > > > > > > be supporting a conservative bias, not a liberal one?
>
> > > > > > > Jeff
>
> > > > > > WHY didnt PBS show films of vaccine injured babies in the PICU
> > > > > > fighting for life? They didnt show one vaccine injured baby, WHY?
>
> > > > > Good question....hmmm./.I KNOW!
>
> > > > > Vaccine injured babies do not exist.
>
> > > > > > Are they scared parents would rather their child have the damn measles
> > > > > > than take a risk of having a dead or severely disabled child from
> > > > > > injecting toxins into their baby?
>
> > > > > > Interesting
>
> > > > > >http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/
>
> > > > > > PBS show Religion and Ethics is funded by Eli Lilly makers of
> > > > > > thimerosal
>
> > > > > > Funding
> > > > > > Funding for RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY is provided by Lilly
> > > > > > Endowment Inc. with additional support from the Corporation for Public
> > > > > > Broadcasting and Mutual of America Life Insurance Company.
> > > > > > The Indianapolis-based Lilly Endowment Inc. was founded in 1937 by
> > > > > > three members of the Lilly family through gifts of stock in their
> > > > > > pharmaceutical business, Eli Lilly and Company. The Endowment is a
> > > > > > separate entity from the company, with a distinct governing board,
> > > > > > staff and location, and is devoted to the causes of religion,
> > > > > > education and community development.
>
> > > > > Do you know the meaning of distinct?
>
> > > > > I am on the board of an endowment, and we are totally independent of
> > > > > everything.
>
> > > > Now, there is a claim for you to prove.
>
> > > Up your DREWhole. For me to prove that would encourage more of your
> > > stalking. Go DREW yourself.
>
> > > You have forgotten what you
>
> > > > posted:
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/b47238df1...
>
> > > > ****Anecdotes are not facts. They are, at best interesting stories.
> > > > At
> > > > worst, outright lies.****
>
> You have taken that out of context (a form of lying). Anecdotes do not
> prove scientific issues. Period.

It is you who lie. Period.

You also posted nothing I posted was interesting. Yet, you keep
replying.

You cannot help yourself. Get help with your insane need to argue.


>
> I have told you this
> 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.3
> times and you have not learned it.

Now, now, Mark do show that many times where you told me that.
>
> As for me proving anything, especially to a DREWbag like yourself, go
> shove it up your DREWhole

Keep proving you lied when you posted I read Torah everyday.
From: Jan Drew on
On May 4, 11:05�am, Mark Probert-Drew <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 4, 6:17�am, Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 3, 7:45�pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > > Donna wrote:
> > > > On May 2, 10:56 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > > >> Jason wrote:
> > > >>> In article
> > > >>> <5d3aede3-1dd6-4d2e-8147-3d6abd17a...(a)o1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>, Mark
> > > >>> Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> On May 2, 8:41=A0am, Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>> On May 1, 11:17=A0pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On May 1, 2:56=A0pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> And wouldn't supporting vaccines and the drug industry, as in this =
> > > >>>> case,
> > > >>>>>>>> be supporting a conservative bias, not a liberal one?
> > > >>>>>>>> Jeff
> > > >>>>>>> WHY didnt PBS show films of vaccine injured babies in the PICU
> > > >>>>>>> fighting for life? They didnt show one vaccine injured baby, WHY?
> > > >>>>>> Good question....hmmm./.I KNOW!
> > > >>>>>> Vaccine injured babies do not exist.
> > > >>>>> MARK!!!!!!!! That is the lamest and cruelest thing Ive ever seen you
> > > >>>>> write. Yes, its cruel you knowing very well that vaccines do injury
> > > >>>>> babies and actually cause death in babies, so AGAIN why didnt PBS show
> > > >>>>> the infants in PICU suffering, yet they showed a baby with measles?
> > > >>>> I would have preferred an hour long show of the consequences of not
> > > >>>> vaccinating. A nice tour of an iron lung ward, rehab centers where 15
> > > >>>> year old children babble because of meningitis destroying their
> > > >>>> brains, children wearing hearing aids, blue babies trying to breath
> > > >>>> inspite of their diptheria, and things like that.
> > > >>>>> Thats not being fair and balanced in journalism.
> > > >>>> There are issues that are subject to fair and balanced. Those subjects
> > > >>>> have two valid sides. In the issue of vaccination, there is only one
> > > >>>> valid side.
> > > >>>> Its using FEAR to get
> > > >>>>> young parents to keep BLINDLY vaccinating their newborn babies with
> > > >>>>> toxins
> > > >>>> You whine about fear? Both sides use fear. The difference is that the
> > > >>>> fear of these diseases is valid. The "fear" of vaccines is bullshit.
> > > >>> The reality is that millions of people do fear vaccines. Have you ever
> > > >>> seen any children that had autism? Believe it or not, most parents FEAR
> > > >>> that their children will develop autism if their children get dozens of
> > > >>> shots that contain mercury.
> > > >> Vaccines don't have mercury.
>
> > > > False!!
>
> > > >>> As you probably know, mercury is a known
> > > >>> poison. There are known effects of mercury poisoning. I once saw a list of
> > > >>> the known effects of mercury poisoning and compared it with a list of the
> > > >>> symptoms of children that have autism and many of the things on both lists
> > > >>> were similar.
> > > >> Only superficially. When you look more closely at the symptoms of the
> > > >> two, they are not that similar. Autism causes specific changes in the
> > > >> brain. Mercury causes *different* changes in the brain.
>
> > > > This is true, known cases of mercury poisoning cause microcephaly not
> > > > macrocephaly, BUT, how do we know its not possible that mercury can
> > > > have this effect on a babies brain development? Do you have scientific
> > > > studies proving mercury doesnt cause macrocephaly? �Does smoking only
> > > > cause lung cancer?
>
> > > Below, you say you did lots of research. You tell us.
>
> > > >>> If you seen that evidence, you would probably say that it
> > > >>> was just a coincidence that the two lists were similar. However, millions
> > > >>> of people now believe that it is not a coincidence that the lists are
> > > >>> similar or in some cases identical.
> > > >> Believe is the key word. Fact is that autism is *not* caused by mercury
> > > >> or vaccines.
>
> > > >> Jeff
>
> > > > I think Autism is caused by mercury, from observation and from tons of
> > > > research. Sure, its not as severe as congenital mercury poisoning,
> > > > But, I feel children with Autism are the way they are because of heavy
> > > > metals causing damage to a childs brain.
>
> > > Your research isn't very good then. After mercury was removed from
> > > vaccines, autism rates didn't go down. Nor do epidemiological studies
> > > support your conjecture.
>
> > According to the EPA 1 out of 6 women of child bearing age has enough
> > mercury in her body to cause harm to her fetus. Vaccines are NOT the
> > only source of mercury
>
> > Now, is this just a coincidence that according to the EPA 1 out of 6
> > women of child bearing age has enough mercury in her body to cause
> > harm to her fetus, and according to the CDC 1 out of 6 children have a
> > developmental problem..... Mercury is a NEUROTOXIN, it does more
> > damage than lead, now if 1 out of 6 women of child bearing age had
> > enough lead in their bodies to cause harm to her fetus, would you than
> > be alarmed?
>
> The operative word is *IF*. Recently, a study by the EPA was entirely
> misquoted and misused by anti-vaccinationist.
>
> Provide the actual study.

Like you provide the proof of your claims.

Poor Mark S Probert who does not back up his claims.

From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 4, 10:17 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:


> Sorry, you credibility is zero.-

You misread the mail. It said that your intelligence is zero (the
scale does not measure negative intelligence).

From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 4, 10:18 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> Diversions and nonsense deleted.

Deleting your own posts? Great idea.

From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 4, 10:24 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On May 3, 6:09 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jan Drew wrote:
> > > On May 2, 10:56 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > >> Jason wrote:
> > >>> In article
> > >>> <5d3aede3-1dd6-4d2e-8147-3d6abd17a...(a)o1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>, Mark
> > >>> Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> On May 2, 8:41=A0am, Donna <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> On May 1, 11:17=A0pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>> On May 1, 2:56=A0pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> And wouldn't supporting vaccines and the drug industry, as in this =
> > >>>> case,
> > >>>>>>>> be supporting a conservative bias, not a liberal one?
> > >>>>>>>> Jeff
> > >>>>>>> WHY didnt PBS show films of vaccine injured babies in the PICU
> > >>>>>>> fighting for life? They didnt show one vaccine injured baby, WHY?
> > >>>>>> Good question....hmmm./.I KNOW!
> > >>>>>> Vaccine injured babies do not exist.
> > >>>>> MARK!!!!!!!! That is the lamest and cruelest thing Ive ever seen you
> > >>>>> write. Yes, its cruel you knowing very well that vaccines do injury
> > >>>>> babies and actually cause death in babies, so AGAIN why didnt PBS show
> > >>>>> the infants in PICU suffering, yet they showed a baby with measles?
> > >>>> I would have preferred an hour long show of the consequences of not
> > >>>> vaccinating. A nice tour of an iron lung ward, rehab centers where 15
> > >>>> year old children babble because of meningitis destroying their
> > >>>> brains, children wearing hearing aids, blue babies trying to breath
> > >>>> inspite of their diptheria, and things like that.
> > >>>>> Thats not being fair and balanced in journalism.
> > >>>> There are issues that are subject to fair and balanced. Those subjects
> > >>>> have two valid sides. In the issue of vaccination, there is only one
> > >>>> valid side.
> > >>>> Its using FEAR to get
> > >>>>> young parents to keep BLINDLY vaccinating their newborn babies with
> > >>>>> toxins
> > >>>> You whine about fear? Both sides use fear. The difference is that the
> > >>>> fear of these diseases is valid. The "fear" of vaccines is bullshit.
> > >>> The reality is that millions of people do fear vaccines. Have you ever
> > >>> seen any children that had autism? Believe it or not, most parents FEAR
> > >>> that their children will develop autism if their children get dozens of
> > >>> shots that contain mercury.
> > >> Vaccines don't have mercury.
>
> > > Yes, they do.  Why do you keep lying?
>
> > Which ones do?
>
> Not doc, can you not read?
>
> http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/thi-table.htm

The imbecile psts a list that shows a child can get the full
compliment of vaccines without a drop of thimerosal.

Jan, see all those zeroes? Although they look like your IQ, they
reflect the amount of thimerosal.

>
> Thimerosal Content in Some US Licensed Vaccines
> February 23, 2010
> PDF of Table (25 KB)
>
> Vaccine
>  Brand Name
>
> (click on the brand name for package insert)
>  Manufacturer
>  Thimerosal Concentration1
>  Mercury
>  mcg/0.5 ml
>
> Anthrax
>  BioThrax
>  BioPort Corporation
>  0
>  0
>
> DTaP
> Tripedia  sanofi pasteur  *  *
> Infanrix
>  GlaxoSmithKline
>  0
>  0
>
> DAPTACEL sanofi pasteur  0
>  0
>
> DTaP-HepB-IPV Pediarix GlaxoSmithKline 0 0
> DTaP-IPV-Hib Pentacel sanofi pasteur 0 0
> DTaP-Hib TriHIBit  sanofi pasteur *  *
> DTwP
>  All Products
>
>  .01%
>  25
>
> DT
>  Diphtheria & Tetanus Toxoids Adsorbed USP
>  multi-dose sanofi pasteur
>  .01%
>  25
>
> single dose  *
>  *
> Td
>  DECAVAC sanofi pasteur *
>  *
> Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxoids Adsorbed
>  sanofi pasteur
>  *
>  *
>
> Tdap
>  ADACEL sanofi pasteur 0 0
> Boostrix
>  GlaxoSmithKline
>  0
>  0
>
> Tetanus Toxoid
>  Tetanus Toxoid Adsorbed USP
>  sanofi pasteur
>  .01%
>  25
>
> Tetanus Toxoid Adsorbed Adult Use .01% 25
> Booster   .01% 25
> Hib
>  ActHIB
>  sanofi pasteur
>  0
>  0
>
> Hiberix GlaxoSmithKline 0 0
> HibTITER    Wyeth-Ayerst 0  0
> PedvaxHIB liquid(2)  Merck  0  0
> Hib/HepB Comvax (3)  Merck  0  0
> Hepatitis A
>  Havrix
>  GlaxoSmithKline
>  0
>  0
>
> Vaqta  adult/pediatric  Merck  0  0
> Hepatitis B
>  Engerix-B preservative free
>  GlaxoSmithKline
>  0
>  0
>
> Recombivax HB preservative free  Merck  0  0
> Hep A-B
>  Twinrix
>  GlaxoSmithKline
>  0
>  0
>
> HPV
>
>  Cervarix
>  GlaxoSmithKline
>  0  0
> Gardasil
>  Merck
>  0  0
> Influenza 2009/10 Formula Afluria multi-dose CSL Limited .01% 24.5
> single dose  0  0
> Agriflu Novartis 0  0
> Fluarix GlaxoSmithKline   ≤1
> FluLaval GlaxoSmithKline .01% 25
> FluMist MedImmune 0 0
> Fluvirin Novartis .01% 24.5
> Fluzone 5 mL vial sanofi pasteur .01% 25
> No Preservative 0 0
> Influenza A - H1N1 2009
>
>  Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
>  multi-dose CSL Limited
>  .01%
>  24.5
>
> single dose 0
>  0
>
> Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
>  multi-dose Novartis
>  .01%
>  25
>
> single dose
>  ≤1
>
> Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
>  multi-dose sanofi pasteur
>  .01%
>  25
>
> single dose (.25 & .5 mL) 0
>  0
>
> Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine multi-dose GlaxoSmithKline .
> 01%
>  25
>
> Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal  MedImmune
> 0 0
> IPV
>  IPOL
>  sanofi pasteur
>  0
>  0
>
> Japanese Encephalitis Ixiaro     commercial | military
>  Intercell Biomedical 0
>  0
>
> JE-Vax sanofi pasteur 0.007%
> Meningococcal
>  Menactra sanofi pasteur 0
>  0
>
> MENOMUNE-A/C/Y/W-135
>  multi-dose sanofi pasteur
>  .01%
>  25
>
> single dose  0
>  0
>
> Menveo Novartis  0
>  0
>
> MMR
>  M-M-R II
>  Merck
>  0
>  0
>
> MMR-Varicella ProQuad Merck 0 0
> Polio IPOL sanofi pasteur  0 0
> Pneumococcal
>  Prevnar
>  Wyeth-Ayerst
>  0
>  0
>
> Pneumovax 23    Merck  0  0
> Rabies
>
> RabAvert  Chiron  0  0
> IMOVAX
>  sanofi pasteur  0  0
> Rotavirus
>  RotaTeq Merck  0  0
> Typhoid Fever  Typhim Vi
>  sanofi pasteur
>  0
>  0
>
> Vivotif Berna Biotch 0  0
> Varicella Zoster
>
>  Varivax
>  Merck
>  0
>  0
>
> Zostavax
>  Merck
>  0
>  0
>
> Yellow Fever
>  YF-VAX
>  sanofi pasteur
>  0
>  0- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Prev: A grade of D
Next: Jeff Utz is not a doctor