From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 25, 2:42 pm, David <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Peter B. wrote:
> > "David" <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:2u2dnTcth6zpXWbWnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> >> Mark Probert-Drew wrote:
> >>> On May 24, 8:55 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>  From: Jeffrey Peter, M.D. (dr...(a)my-deja.com)
>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: "Dr. Kid" ...
> >>>>> View: Complete Thread (37 articles)
> >>>>> Original Format
> >>>>> Newsgroups: misc.kids.health, misc.health.alternative
> >>>>> Date: 2000-11-07 06:00:15 PST
> >>> Jeff Utz has nothing to do with this. Jan has her girdle in a wad over
> >>> Wakefield being delicensed.
>
> >>> Jeff voluntarily decided to stop practicing medicine, as is his
> >>> right.
>
> >>> Wakefield's license was taken away for good cause shown.
>
> >> Could that have been to avoid some nasty legal action?
>
> > Again this shows your ignorance. It would have prevented nothing.
>
> > Except for servicing ignorant toads like you.
>
> Right, such things never happen.-

Within the context of your question, it never happens.

From: David on
Peter B. wrote:
> "David" <me(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ptidnRGMj-eLh2HWnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>> Peter B. wrote:
>>> "David" <me(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2u2dnTcth6zpXWbWnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>>> Mark Probert-Drew wrote:
>>>>> On May 24, 8:55 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>> From: Jeffrey Peter, M.D. (dr...(a)my-deja.com)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: "Dr. Kid" ...
>>>>>>> View: Complete Thread (37 articles)
>>>>>>> Original Format
>>>>>>> Newsgroups: misc.kids.health, misc.health.alternative
>>>>>>> Date: 2000-11-07 06:00:15 PST
>>>>> Jeff Utz has nothing to do with this. Jan has her girdle in a wad over
>>>>> Wakefield being delicensed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff voluntarily decided to stop practicing medicine, as is his
>>>>> right.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wakefield's license was taken away for good cause shown.
>>>>>
>>>> Could that have been to avoid some nasty legal action?
>>> Again this shows your ignorance. It would have prevented nothing.
>>>
>>> Except for servicing ignorant toads like you.
>> Right, such things never happen.
>
> You believe the garden fairies too?
>
>
I do believe that you may be a fairy, does that count?
From: David on
Mark Probert-Drew wrote:
> On May 25, 2:42 pm, David <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Peter B. wrote:
>>> "David" <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2u2dnTcth6zpXWbWnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>>> Mark Probert-Drew wrote:
>>>>> On May 24, 8:55 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>> From: Jeffrey Peter, M.D. (dr...(a)my-deja.com)
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: "Dr. Kid" ...
>>>>>>> View: Complete Thread (37 articles)
>>>>>>> Original Format
>>>>>>> Newsgroups: misc.kids.health, misc.health.alternative
>>>>>>> Date: 2000-11-07 06:00:15 PST
>>>>> Jeff Utz has nothing to do with this. Jan has her girdle in a wad over
>>>>> Wakefield being delicensed.
>>>>> Jeff voluntarily decided to stop practicing medicine, as is his
>>>>> right.
>>>>> Wakefield's license was taken away for good cause shown.
>>>> Could that have been to avoid some nasty legal action?
>>> Again this shows your ignorance. It would have prevented nothing.
>>> Except for servicing ignorant toads like you.
>> Right, such things never happen.-
>
> Within the context of your question, it never happens.
>
Only a complete fool would say "never" in the context of this. You
made the grade!
From: Mark Probert-Drew on
On May 26, 9:06 am, David <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Probert-Drew wrote:
> > On May 25, 2:42 pm, David <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Peter B. wrote:
> >>> "David" <m...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:2u2dnTcth6zpXWbWnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> >>>> Mark Probert-Drew wrote:
> >>>>> On May 24, 8:55 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>  From: Jeffrey Peter, M.D. (dr...(a)my-deja.com)
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: "Dr. Kid" ...
> >>>>>>> View: Complete Thread (37 articles)
> >>>>>>> Original Format
> >>>>>>> Newsgroups: misc.kids.health, misc.health.alternative
> >>>>>>> Date: 2000-11-07 06:00:15 PST
> >>>>> Jeff Utz has nothing to do with this. Jan has her girdle in a wad over
> >>>>> Wakefield being delicensed.
> >>>>> Jeff voluntarily decided to stop practicing medicine, as is his
> >>>>> right.
> >>>>> Wakefield's license was taken away for good cause shown.
> >>>> Could that have been to avoid some nasty legal action?
> >>> Again this shows your ignorance. It would have prevented nothing.
> >>> Except for servicing ignorant toads like you.
> >> Right, such things never happen.-
>
> > Within the context of your question, it never happens.
>
>   Only a complete fool would say "never" in  the context of this. You
> made the grade!-

You sure do have a reading comprehension problem.
From: Peter B. on
"David" <me(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4IKdnXYg6b0RgWDWnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> Peter B. wrote:
>> "David" <me(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ptidnRGMj-eLh2HWnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>> Peter B. wrote:
>>>> "David" <me(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:2u2dnTcth6zpXWbWnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>>>> Mark Probert-Drew wrote:
>>>>>> On May 24, 8:55 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Jeffrey Peter, M.D. (dr...(a)my-deja.com)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: "Dr. Kid" ...
>>>>>>>> View: Complete Thread (37 articles)
>>>>>>>> Original Format
>>>>>>>> Newsgroups: misc.kids.health, misc.health.alternative
>>>>>>>> Date: 2000-11-07 06:00:15 PST
>>>>>> Jeff Utz has nothing to do with this. Jan has her girdle in a wad
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> Wakefield being delicensed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff voluntarily decided to stop practicing medicine, as is his
>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wakefield's license was taken away for good cause shown.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Could that have been to avoid some nasty legal action?
>>>> Again this shows your ignorance. It would have prevented nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Except for servicing ignorant toads like you.
>>> Right, such things never happen.
>>
>> You believe the garden fairies too?
> I do believe that you may be a fairy, does that count?

It does prove your sexual tendencies.