From: Greegor on
G > Dan, you are a legend in your own mind.

DJS3 > I love it when you're left to write messages all by yourself.

G > You provide all of the help I need!

DJS3 > You don't need help to be a liar, grag.
DJS3 > All you need to do is get up in the morning.

G > You talked about your family and your cases
G > with CPS, but when I asked some rather pointed
G > questions you then said you will only answer
G > questions if I sent them to you in paper
G > (like an interrogatory, paper deposition) by
G > way of the US Mail.

DJS3 > True.
DJS3 > Send the questions by Return Receipt so you'll know I got them.

You can't answer me the way I have answered you?
You can't take what you dish out?

G > For example, you said you had a BIPOLAR
G > ex-wife and you had kids with her.
G >
G > But you won't answer the question about
G > WHEN in that process you knew she was
G > bipolar.
G >
G > Even your good buddy Kent has said that
G > it would be incredible if you didn't know
G > before you married her.

DJS3 > You married a bi-polar woman, grag.
DJS3 > How did you not know she was bi-polar before you married her?

Asked and answered already.
I have ANSWERED that line of questions, Dan!
You have not.

You think you're SPECIAL though, don't you, Dan?





You talked about your family and your cases
with CPS, but when I asked some rather pointed
questions you then said you will only answer
questions if I sent them to you in paper
(like an interrogatory, paper deposition) by
way of the US Mail.

For example, you said you had a BIPOLAR
ex-wife and you had kids with her.

But you won't answer the question about
WHEN in that process you knew she was
bipolar.

Even your good buddy Kent has said that
it would be incredible if you didn't know
before you married her.

Certainly it would be incredible that you
didn't know before you made BABIES
(plural) with her.

Yet you cannot answer such a simple
question without ""lawyering up"" ?

You were just FINE with asking questions,
mostly questions LOADED with nasty
presumptions.

But you can't answer such a reasonable
and logical question considering your
own and VOLUNTARY statements?

YOU stated your ex was bipolar.
YOU stated you had kids with her.

YOU have been ducking this question.
Exactly WHEN in that process of
getting MARRIED and making BABIES
did you KNOW your ex-wife was BIPOLAR?

From: Kent Wills on
At one time, not so long ago, ex-con (one conviction for OWI and TWO
convictions for BEATING his ex-wife), child abuser and self confessed
user and abuser of illegal drugs, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson
<greegor47(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>G > Even your good buddy Kent has said that
>G > it would be incredible if you didn't know
>G > before you married her.
>
>DJS3 > You married a bi-polar woman, grag.
>DJS3 > How did you not know she was bi-polar before you married her?
>
>Asked and answered already.
>I have ANSWERED that line of questions, Dan!

No, you have not.
As is the norm with you, all you've ever done is HIDE from the
truth that would come out in the answer.


A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):

Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT

"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead

Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."

"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser

As of Saturday, March 27, 2010:

SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT

JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.

Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him from Ed Polkers. There is nothing to even suggest any of the
money legally owed has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely
expired, but Greg still can't risk getting a job due to it.

As of Saturday, March 27, 2010:
Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:

Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00

$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00

Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.

Me: Hey, he used your standards.
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic
reasoning.

Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic.