|
From: Greegor on 15 Jun 2010 19:04 G > Dan, you are a legend in your own mind. DJS3 > I love it when you're left to write messages all by yourself. G > You provide all of the help I need! DJS3 > You don't need help to be a liar, grag. DJS3 > All you need to do is get up in the morning. G > You talked about your family and your cases G > with CPS, but when I asked some rather pointed G > questions you then said you will only answer G > questions if I sent them to you in paper G > (like an interrogatory, paper deposition) by G > way of the US Mail. DJS3 > True. DJS3 > Send the questions by Return Receipt so you'll know I got them. You can't answer me the way I have answered you? You can't take what you dish out? G > For example, you said you had a BIPOLAR G > ex-wife and you had kids with her. G > G > But you won't answer the question about G > WHEN in that process you knew she was G > bipolar. G > G > Even your good buddy Kent has said that G > it would be incredible if you didn't know G > before you married her. DJS3 > You married a bi-polar woman, grag. DJS3 > How did you not know she was bi-polar before you married her? Asked and answered already. I have ANSWERED that line of questions, Dan! You have not. You think you're SPECIAL though, don't you, Dan? You talked about your family and your cases with CPS, but when I asked some rather pointed questions you then said you will only answer questions if I sent them to you in paper (like an interrogatory, paper deposition) by way of the US Mail. For example, you said you had a BIPOLAR ex-wife and you had kids with her. But you won't answer the question about WHEN in that process you knew she was bipolar. Even your good buddy Kent has said that it would be incredible if you didn't know before you married her. Certainly it would be incredible that you didn't know before you made BABIES (plural) with her. Yet you cannot answer such a simple question without ""lawyering up"" ? You were just FINE with asking questions, mostly questions LOADED with nasty presumptions. But you can't answer such a reasonable and logical question considering your own and VOLUNTARY statements? YOU stated your ex was bipolar. YOU stated you had kids with her. YOU have been ducking this question. Exactly WHEN in that process of getting MARRIED and making BABIES did you KNOW your ex-wife was BIPOLAR?
From: Kent Wills on 16 Jun 2010 04:14 At one time, not so long ago, ex-con (one conviction for OWI and TWO convictions for BEATING his ex-wife), child abuser and self confessed user and abuser of illegal drugs, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson <greegor47(a)gmail.com> wrote: >G > Even your good buddy Kent has said that >G > it would be incredible if you didn't know >G > before you married her. > >DJS3 > You married a bi-polar woman, grag. >DJS3 > How did you not know she was bi-polar before you married her? > >Asked and answered already. >I have ANSWERED that line of questions, Dan! No, you have not. As is the norm with you, all you've ever done is HIDE from the truth that would come out in the answer. A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he DEMANDS be held to others): Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!" Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by attacking my first wife (deceased). http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs? Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course." "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser As of Saturday, March 27, 2010: SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE Comments: OPA $2805.04 COPIES TO PA VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT JUDGEMENT DEFAULT Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04 + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS. Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON FEES $35.60 Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against him from Ed Polkers. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still can't risk getting a job due to it. As of Saturday, March 27, 2010: Financials Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN) Citation Number: Summary Orig Paid Due COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00 FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00 RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 $9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00 Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over $8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife. Me: Hey, he used your standards. Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson: It's textbook psychopathic reasoning. Greg admitting his standards are psychopathic.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: grag ducks LOGICAL questions which stem from his OWN comments Next: Daniel Sullivan Q and A |