From: Dan Sullivan on
On Jul 20, 11:39 pm, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 20, 9:34 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 20, 1:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>
> > > Notice how this caseworker really has
> > > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
> > > would be removed because of the
> > > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>
> > > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>
> > We'll see if he did things right if DFS shows back up with a warrant.
>
> The question was not that simple, Betty.
>
> It was about whether the response conforms
> to Dan's purported advice.

My advice is to tell the case worker "Please put whatever information
you have for me in writing so I can discuss it with my attorney. And
after I speak with my attorney, I'll get back to you."

That does seem to be what the father is telling the caseworker.

> Please weigh in on that!
> Since you are somebody who has posted
> testimonials for Dan, your assistance could
> be even more helpful than Firemonkey's.

Assistance in what?

> Dan apparently caught some mention of the
> DA's office, and expressed some concern
> that the caseworker said that.

Apparently you didn't watch the video, grag.

Typical.

> What advice has Dan given you that would
> relate to the first contact situation in the video?

I don't believe I ever gave FM direct advice.

If I'm not mistaken she used the advice I gave other people in her own
situation.
From: Dan Sullivan on
On Jul 20, 11:13 pm, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>
> G > Notice how this caseworker really has
> G > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
> G > would be removed because of the
> G > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
> G >
> G > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>
> Roberta Firemonkey wrote
> FM > The man in this video did exactly as Dan
> FM > has suggested people do when in this
> FM > situation. He remained calm, explained
> FM > to the worker he would need a warrant.

Actually I believe the father said something to the effect of "you do
what you have to do, and I'll do what I have to do."

I don't recall the father saying he needed a warrant.

> I have never seen Dan advise anybody to
> insist on a signed warrant.

Are you implying I advise people to insist on an unsigned warrant?

> Just the opposite,
> I have seen Dan ridicule that tactic, implying
> that it would make the caseworker suspicious.

I don't recall saying or implying that.

> FM > From the video it was clear that the
> FM > worker had seen the baby and the
> FM > inside of the apartment and saw no harm.
>
> Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of insisting
> on a warrant?
>
> What was it about the video that gave you
> the impression he had let the worker see
> the baby and the apartment?

What from the vid gives you the impression the father let the worker
see the baby and the apartment?

The father said the worker saw the baby and the apartment, but the
father didn't say he was the one who let the worker.

> If the worker had seen the baby and apartment,
> then why was he threatening the Dad with
> a child removal order?

You didn't watch the video, grag.

Typical.

> FM > Get a life gag.
>
> Dan, One of your biggest supporters
> has implied that this man's response
> WAS to your specifications, but also
> states that the man let the worker
> look at the child and apartment.

FM didn't say that.

> Please resolve the logical conflicts Firemonkey presented.
>
> 1.
> Do you advise parents to insist on a warrant signed by a Judge?

When?

> 2.
> Would you have advised this Dad to let the
> caseworker look at the apartment and the child?

If the allegation was injury to the baby, I'd advise him to show the
baby to the case worker.

And opening the door to an apartment exposes the living room and
probably the kitchen.

So if the allegation was a cluttered or dangerous living condition,
the worker already saw the home was safe.

> 3.
> Did you notice where the caseworker is
> threatening to do a child removal? Or why?

You didn't watch the video, grag.

> 4.
> Did the caseworker say anything you think is incorrect?

Read my earlier comments.
From: krp on

"Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan(a)optonline.net> wrote in message
news:0b7e979b-951b-4b5a-b8bd-264fa5d7098a(a)25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 20, 11:39 pm, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 20, 9:34 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Jul 20, 1:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>>
>> > > Notice how this caseworker really has
>> > > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
>> > > would be removed because of the
>> > > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>>
>> > > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>>
>> > We'll see if he did things right if DFS shows back up with a warrant.
>>
>> The question was not that simple, Betty.
>>
>> It was about whether the response conforms
>> to Dan's purported advice.
>
> My advice is to tell the case worker "Please put whatever information
> you have for me in writing so I can discuss it with my attorney. And
> after I speak with my attorney, I'll get back to you."


That's your best "LEGAL ADVICE" to your clients, right ATTORNEY Sullivan?
Think it works well for your clients Danny?
As you PRETEND to be a lawyer and dispensing your legal advice sans license.


From: Dan Sullivan on
On Jul 21, 4:52 am, " krp" <krp24...(a)verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...(a)optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:0b7e979b-951b-4b5a-b8bd-264fa5d7098a(a)25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jul 20, 11:39 pm, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jul 20, 9:34 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Jul 20, 1:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > >http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>
> >> > > Notice how this caseworker really has
> >> > > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
> >> > > would be removed because of the
> >> > > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>
> >> > > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>
> >> > We'll see if he did things right if DFS shows back up with a warrant.
>
> >> The question was not that simple, Betty.
>
> >> It was about whether the response conforms
> >> to Dan's purported advice.
>
> > My advice is to tell the case worker "Please put whatever information
> > you have for me in writing so I can discuss it with my attorney. And
> > after I speak with my attorney, I'll get back to you."
>
> That's your best "LEGAL ADVICE" to your clients, right ATTORNEY Sullivan?

That was the advice of a Suffolk County ADA.

> Think it works well for your clients Danny?
> As you PRETEND to be a lawyer and dispensing your legal advice sans license.

That's not legal advice.

What would you advise people to do when CPS is at their door with an
allegation or CAN, pangborn?

Call you with thousands of dollars?

From: Dragon's Girl on
On Jul 20, 10:39 pm, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 20, 9:34 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 20, 1:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>
> > > Notice how this caseworker really has
> > > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
> > > would be removed because of the
> > > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>
> > > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>
> > We'll see if he did things right if DFS shows back up with a warrant.
>
> The question was not that simple, Betty.
>
> It was about whether the response conforms
> to Dan's purported advice.
>
> Please weigh in on that!
> Since you are somebody who has posted
> testimonials for Dan, your assistance could
> be even more helpful than Firemonkey's.
>
> Dan apparently caught some mention of the
> DA's office, and expressed some concern
> that the caseworker said that.
>
> What advice has Dan given you that would
> relate to the first contact situation in the video?

Since Dan began supporting me AFTER the 'first contact', I have never
had a conversations with him in regard to 'first contact', so I cannot
tell you about advice that I never got, and never had a need for.