From: krp on

"LK" <Patism66(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5ba61db5-fdb0-4c73-bea1-bb2523a2f14e(a)a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 8:05 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...(a)optonline.net> wrote:
> On Jul 20, 2:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>
> > Notice how this caseworker really has
> > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
> > would be removed because of the
> > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>
> > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>
> Post your opinion, grag.

Come on Dan. Is that a difficult question for you? Why don't you just
answer it? I mean with your vast and superior knowledge of the system
and everything, you must be the only person in this group qualified to
give an accurate assessment. Wouldn't you agree?

Well you have a point. With DAN'S status as the FOREMOST ATTORNEY ion
America, answering Greg's question should be a snap.


From: Dan Sullivan on
On Jul 20, 9:07 am, LK <Patis...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 20, 8:05 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...(a)optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 20, 2:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>
> > > Notice how this caseworker really has
> > > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
> > > would be removed because of the
> > > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>
> > > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>
> > Post your opinion, grag.
>
> Come on Dan. Is that a difficult question for you? Why don't you just
> answer it?

Because I've posted what I recommed people do when CPS is at their
door more times than I care to count.

And grag knows this.

He can copy and paste what I've already said.

From: krp on

"Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan(a)optonline.net> wrote in message
news:ab38c46d-862e-4932-a0ba-4da6a0fc98b3(a)s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 20, 9:07 am, LK <Patis...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 20, 8:05 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...(a)optonline.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Jul 20, 2:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>>
>> > > Notice how this caseworker really has
>> > > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
>> > > would be removed because of the
>> > > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>>
>> > > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>>
>> > Post your opinion, grag.
>>
>> Come on Dan. Is that a difficult question for you? Why don't you just
>> answer it?
>
> Because I've posted what I recommed people do when CPS is at their
> door more times than I care to count.

As a PRACTICING USENET LAWYER!!! :-))))))))))



From: Dan Sullivan on

" krp" <krp2457k(a)verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WmHgk.177$_l.153(a)trnddc04...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan(a)optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:ab38c46d-862e-4932-a0ba-4da6a0fc98b3(a)s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jul 20, 9:07 am, LK <Patis...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 20, 8:05 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...(a)optonline.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Jul 20, 2:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > >http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>>>
>>> > > Notice how this caseworker really has
>>> > > NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
>>> > > would be removed because of the
>>> > > Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>>>
>>> > > Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?
>>>
>>> > Post your opinion, grag.
>>>
>>> Come on Dan. Is that a difficult question for you? Why don't you just
>>> answer it?
>>
>> Because I've posted what I recommed people do when CPS is at their
>> door more times than I care to count.
>
> As a PRACTICING USENET LAWYER!!! :-))))))))))

I never said that.


From: Dragon's Girl on
On Jul 20, 1:07 am, Greegor <Greego...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=1YqMxvPgnzc
>
> Notice how this caseworker really has
> NOTHING yet is asserting that the child
> would be removed because of the
> Dad's refusal to submit without a warrant.
>
> Dan Sullivan, Did this Dad do it right?

We'll see if he did things right if DFS shows back up with a warrant.