From: Jan Drew on

> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:24:00 -0700 (PDT), Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 26, 3:29?pm, Jeffrey Peter Joseph Utz LIAR NOT
> ><kidsdoc2...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Garbage without a shred of proof.
>
From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 27, 7:45 pm, Mindy <usrc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 26, 6:06 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 26, 12:20 pm, Mindy <usrc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 26, 8:53 am, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:>  Autism Linked To Swine Flu Vaccinehttp://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/130053/-Autism-link-to-swine-flu-...
> > > > The vaccine includes an additive that could be linked to autism
> > > > BRITAIN'S swine flu vaccine contains an additive dropped from children's
> > > > jabs five years ago over fears it is linked to autism. The vaccine contains
> > > > the mercury-based compound Thimerosal, which has not been used in childhood
> > > > vaccines since 2004. It was removed from jabs in America 10 years ago
>
> > > ---
> > > So, what you are trying to tell me is... that since the Thimerosal has
> > > been removed from childhood vaccines, there have been no new cases of
> > > Autism?!?!(sarcasm emphasised)
>
> > > There are plenty of adults, who never recieved the MMR(main vaccine
> > > blamed) that are on the spectrum.  So where is the 'link' there?
>
> > > Vaccines contain many icky things, but so does processed food and
> > > drinks.  Unless one isolates themselves on a desert isle they will
> > > always be subject to icky things...
>
> > > Oh that''s right!  There's icky things there too.
>
> > >  after
>
> > > > issues were raised by the US Public Health Service. UK Government / WHO
> > > > vaccines drug dealer Professor David Salisbury defended its use in Swine Flu
> > > > vaccines.
> > > > Express Reporter, Daily Express/The One Click Group
>
> > > I don't understand why, if something has been banned for use in
> > > vaccines in the US, why it would be allowed to be used in any current
> > > vaccines, no matter how rushed they are to get the vaccine out.  Why
> > > put it in there at all?
>
> > > I do not understand why a company who is supposed to be making things
> > > to protect people would knowingly and intentionally use such a
> > > controversial ingrediant, when they have proven that vaccines CAN be
> > > made without it.
>
> > You must have flunked Illogic 101 and Conspiracy Theory 102.
>
> > If you had passed, you would understand.
>
> > :)
>
> > BTW, your post was funny and right on.
>
> -----
> I'm glad someone found it humorous!  Thank You.
> I like to think I am a logical thinker and have good common sense most
> of the time.  Even when I'm wrong(due to lack of knowledge/mis
> informed) I don't realize it until the facts are shown to me or I
> discover them on my own.
>
> I did not completely fail 'conspiracy theory 102 - beleive me, I have
> a few.  I just read so much stuff here and many of the regular posters
> never give legitimate links to the facts.
>
> When I dig deep enough into the CDC website, I find some pretty scary
> stats.  But I realize too, that because I am not a scientist, medical
> professional or a biologist, I can't completely understand what
> everything means.
>
> I love the internet.  No matter what direction I want to sway my
> opinion to, I can find enough info. to let me sway whatever direction
> I want to and do it with confidense!
>
> I wish every decision I ever had to make was simple cut and dry with
> no bull sh-t to dig through.
>
> It does not matter to me what I beleive when it comes to discussions.
> When someone does not seem 'logical' in their post, I can argue or
> debate the opposite quite well most of the time. And when it is
> something I truly believe in or feel strongly about, even better.
>
> For some reason, john's post this time seemed shallow enough that it
> irritated me.;-)

If this post ofJohn's irritated you, I suggest an extra large bottle
of Calamine lotion.

From: Jan Drew on
On Sep 26, 9:06�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 26, 12:20�pm, Mindy <usrc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 26, 8:53�am, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:> �Autism Linked To Swine Flu Vaccinehttp://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/130053/-Autism-link-to-swine-flu-...
> > > The vaccine includes an additive that could be linked to autism
> > > BRITAIN'S swine flu vaccine contains an additive dropped from children's
> > > jabs five years ago over fears it is linked to autism. The vaccine contains
> > > the mercury-based compound Thimerosal, which has not been used in childhood
> > > vaccines since 2004. It was removed from jabs in America 10 years ago
>
> > ---
> > So, what you are trying to tell me is... that since the Thimerosal has
> > been removed from childhood vaccines, there have been no new cases of
> > Autism?!?!(sarcasm emphasised)
>
> > There are plenty of adults, who never recieved the MMR(main vaccine
> > blamed) that are on the spectrum. �So where is the 'link' there?
>
> > Vaccines contain many icky things, but so does processed food and
> > drinks. �Unless one isolates themselves on a desert isle they will
> > always be subject to icky things...
>
> > Oh that''s right! �There's icky things there too.
>
> > �after
>
> > > issues were raised by the US Public Health Service. UK Government / WHO
> > > vaccines drug dealer Professor David Salisbury defended its use in Swine Flu
> > > vaccines.
> > > Express Reporter, Daily Express/The One Click Group
>
> > I don't understand why, if something has been banned for use in
> > vaccines in the US, why it would be allowed to be used in any current
> > vaccines, no matter how rushed they are to get the vaccine out. �Why
> > put it in there at all?
>
> > I do not understand why a company who is supposed to be making things
> > to protect people would knowingly and intentionally use such a
> > controversial ingrediant, when they have proven that vaccines CAN be
> > made without it.
>
> You must have flunked Illogic 101 and Conspiracy Theory 102.

Do post post of Comsiracy 102,

Oh, tha'ts right yow made it up.but remained silent when disbarred.
>



From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 27, 8:10 pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:24:00 -0700 (PDT), Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > >On Sep 26, 3:29?pm, Jeffrey Peter Joseph Utz LIAR NOT
> > ><kidsdoc2...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Garbage without a shred of proof.-

Perfect description of your usual posts which are cut and pastes from
Un-Natural News, the National Vacccine Dis-information Center (NVDiC,
where they give you VD instead of ID), etc.

From: Jan Drew on
On Sep 27, 4:56�pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Jan Drew wrote:
> > On Sep 26, 12:21 pm, Jeffrey Peter Joseph Utz NOT
> > <kidsdoc2...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Still lying about being a kidsdoc.
>
> > Refuses to provide proof.
>
> > Thus, nothing he posts can be believe, except from the lying *gang*.
>
> Where did I say I am a pediatrician?
>
> Jeff

Duh, when you post as a idsdoc,
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: ACCUTANE: A MODERN HORROR STORY
Next: DENTAL HEALTH