From: The One True Zhen Jue on
On Feb 10, 4:57 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
> Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >O
> >> You mean the man who developed the RotaTEQ vaccine that has saved tens
> >> of thousands of children's lives and has prevented even more
> >> hospitalizations? Of course he should be well compensated for that.
>
> >> As for making more money from the vaccine....not possible.-
>
> >How has the Rota TEQ vaccine saved tens of thousands of lives?
>
> Because diarrhea is one of the leading causes of infant death around
> the world. The last I heard there were 55,000 hospital admissions a
> year in the US as a result of rotavirus infection.
>
>
>
> >Why was Offits first "diarrhea" vaccine pulled from the market? Did it
> >cause DEATHS in infants?
>
> As it wasn't recalled the question is moot. A different vaccine was
> recalled because post-market monitoring indicated a slight increase in
> a condition called intersusception. Nobody died, unlike many of the
> kids who get infected by the virus the vaccine works against.
>
>
>
> >When will Pharma invent a vaccine for sneezing, Im sure that one will
> >save thousands of lives, too!
>
> If you are seriously equating sneezing with rotavirus infection then I
> doubt your sanity.

Given the choice, she said she'd rather her child have polio than risk
getting the polio vaccine.
I don't think there can be any reasonable doubt regarding her lack
sanity.

>
> --
> Peter Bowditch aa #2243
> The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
> Australian Council Against Health Fraudhttp://www.acahf.org.au
> To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
>
> Sponsor me in the World's Greatest Shavehttp://my.imisfriendraising.com.au/personalPage.aspx?SID=88852

From: Mark Probert on
On Feb 10, 5:55 pm, PeterB - Original <p...(a)mytrashmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 9, 11:11 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 8, 11:38 pm, PeterB - Original <p...(a)mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 8, 11:43 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 7, 9:19 pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Let's not forget that he was developing a "transfer factor" that would
> > > > > > substitute for the measles vaccine. His market, thus his income, would
> > > > > > be greatly enhanced if there was widespread distrust of the MMR
> > > > > > vaccine, which is clearly his intent.
>
> > > > > You keep repeating this, Yet, I haven't seen any proof of such a claim.
>
> > > > I posted it elsewhere and how he admitted to it in the GMC
> > > > proceedings.
>
> > > If you were to tell the truth, would you go "pop" with a poof of
> > > smoke, or just morph into a pile of locusts?
>
> > Listen, stupid, I posted a quote from the GMC report where Wakefield
> > admitted ...
>
> One may "admit" to activities that are illegal, but there was nothing
> illegal about it.

Dipwad, I never claimed there was anything illegal about it.

Now, if you admit that you are the twin brother of strawman and love
eating red herring, we would be getting somewhere, and you would be
getting closer to a cure.

>
> > he was developing a measles transfer factor which would
> > substitute for a vaccine. Even you are not so stupid as to believe
> > that if he damaged the market for MMR, that his potion would be a
> > better seller, and thus make him more money.
>
> If you mean it's a shame that MMR continues to be used despite the
> lack of evidence for its safety, regardless of Wakefield's research,
> I agree.

There is plenty of evidence for its safety. The fact that you do not
know it, does not mean it does not exist.

In fact, if your "knew" it, you would weasal around that. You will
NEVER admit a vaccine is safe and effective, even if a ton of evidence
is produced.
>
> > Or, have I underestimated your stupidity?
>
> Just your own.-

Yes, I underestimated your stupidity and perfidy.

From: Mark Probert on
On Feb 10, 5:27 pm, PeterB - Original <p...(a)mytrashmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 9, 4:16 am, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
>
> > "PeterB - Original" <p...(a)mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:f47e089c-534b-42a3-91c4-149ce5feeb18(a)z26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> > On Feb 7, 6:51 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > > john wrote:
> > > > "dr_jeff" <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
> > > >news:9OCdnfjKn-Qt2fLWnZ2dnUVZ_tpi4p2d(a)giganews.com...
> > > >> <copyrighted garbaged deleted>
>
> > > Autism is not caused by vaccines.  Period.
>
> > That has never been proven.  Period.
>
> > yep, again and againhttp://www.whale.to/vaccine/vaccine_autism_proven.html
>
> I agree that vaccines are causing a variety of neurological disorders,
> even death.  I was referring to  the other poster's claim that
> vaccines do not cause autism.

They don't. If you have some research showing otherwise, post it.

From: Kevysmom on

> >> You mean the man who developed the RotaTEQ vaccine that has saved tens
> >> of thousands of children's lives and has prevented even more
> >> hospitalizations? Of course he should be well compensated for that.
>
> >> As for making more money from the vaccine....not possible.-
>
> >How has the Rota TEQ vaccine saved tens of thousands of lives?
>
> Because diarrhea is one of the leading causes of infant death around
> the world. The last I heard there were 55,000 hospital admissions a
> year in the US as a result of rotavirus infection.


I dont believe those numbers, and I certainly dont believe very many
infants die from diarrhea in the US.(Dehydration is curable with a
simple thing called an IV) Maybe in third world countries where they
drink very contaminated polluted water.






>
>
>
> >Why was Offits first "diarrhea" vaccine pulled from the market? Did it
> >cause DEATHS in infants?
>
> As it wasn't recalled the question is moot.


His FIRST vaccine was indeed recalled, Because it caused DEATHS in
newborn babies.


A different vaccine was
> recalled because post-market monitoring indicated a slight increase in
> a condition called intersusception. Nobody died, unlike many of the
> kids who get infected by the virus the vaccine works against.



Yes, babies died, thats why it was recalled, And this new vaccine is
causing intersusception also!



>
>
>
> >When will Pharma invent a vaccine for sneezing, Im sure that one will
> >save thousands of lives, too!
>
> If you are seriously equating sneezing with rotavirus infection then I
> doubt your sanity.






Okay, runny nose? Shall we have a vaccine for runny noses?



>
> --
> Peter Bowditch aa #2243
> The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
> Australian Council Against Health Fraudhttp://www.acahf.org.au
> To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
>
> Sponsor me in the World's Greatest Shavehttp://my.imisfriendraising.com.au/personalPage.aspx?SID=88852

From: Kevysmom on

> Given the choice, she said she'd rather her child have polio than risk
> getting the polio vaccine.
> I don't think there can be any reasonable doubt regarding her lack
> sanity.





You are a liar, I said... I would rather my son have polio than to
have a vaccine injury