From: Mark Probert on 10 Feb 2010 11:33
On Feb 10, 11:26 am, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > You mean the man who developed the RotaTEQ vaccine that has saved tens
> > of thousands of children's lives and has prevented even more
> > hospitalizations? Of course he should be well compensated for that.
> > As for making more money from the vaccine....not possible.-
> How has the Rota TEQ vaccine saved tens of thousands of lives?
Look up rotavirus for information.
Rotavirus causes severe diarrhea which in undernourished and
malnourished childen results in severe dehydration leading to death.
Even in healthy children, severe dehydration occurs, often
> Why was Offits first "diarrhea" vaccine pulled from the market?
Dr. Offit only developed one vaccine, i.e. RotaTEQ. You are referring
to RotaSHIELD, which was pulled because it caused a severe
complication. That complication was first seen when the vaccine was
mass marketed, because it was rare.
> cause DEATHS in infants?
I believe that there were some deaths due to RotaSHIELD.
> When will Pharma invent a vaccine for sneezing, Im sure that one will
> save thousands of lives, too!
That was a stupid comment.
From: Peter Bowditch on 10 Feb 2010 16:57
Kevysmom <kevysmom09(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> You mean the man who developed the RotaTEQ vaccine that has saved tens
>> of thousands of children's lives and has prevented even more
>> hospitalizations? Of course he should be well compensated for that.
>> As for making more money from the vaccine....not possible.-
>How has the Rota TEQ vaccine saved tens of thousands of lives?
Because diarrhea is one of the leading causes of infant death around
the world. The last I heard there were 55,000 hospital admissions a
year in the US as a result of rotavirus infection.
>Why was Offits first "diarrhea" vaccine pulled from the market? Did it
>cause DEATHS in infants?
As it wasn't recalled the question is moot. A different vaccine was
recalled because post-market monitoring indicated a slight increase in
a condition called intersusception. Nobody died, unlike many of the
kids who get infected by the virus the vaccine works against.
>When will Pharma invent a vaccine for sneezing, Im sure that one will
>save thousands of lives, too!
If you are seriously equating sneezing with rotavirus infection then I
doubt your sanity.
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Sponsor me in the World's Greatest Shave
From: PeterB - Original on 10 Feb 2010 17:27
On Feb 9, 4:16 am, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
> "PeterB - Original" <p...(a)mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:f47e089c-534b-42a3-91c4-149ce5feeb18(a)z26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 7, 6:51 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > john wrote:
> > > "dr_jeff" <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
> > >news:9OCdnfjKn-Qt2fLWnZ2dnUVZ_tpi4p2d(a)giganews.com...
> > >> <copyrighted garbaged deleted>
> > Autism is not caused by vaccines. Period.
> That has never been proven. Period.
> yep, again and againhttp://www.whale.to/vaccine/vaccine_autism_proven.html
I agree that vaccines are causing a variety of neurological disorders,
even death. I was referring to the other poster's claim that
vaccines do not cause autism.
> "there are now at least six published legal or scientific cases of children
> regressing into ASD following vaccination - and many more will be revealed
> in due time......Another fact that gets little attention in this
> never-ending debate is that more than 1,300 cases of vaccine injuries have
> been paid out in vaccine court, in which the court ruled that childhood
> immunizations caused encephalopathy (brain disease), encephalitis (brain
> swelling) and/or seizure disorders. Encephalopathy/encephalitis is found in
> most if not all ASD cases, and seizure disorders in about a third of them.. "
From: PeterB - Original on 10 Feb 2010 17:34
On Feb 9, 1:36 am, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> "PeterB - Original" <p...(a)mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:610e87cb-5fe2-4321-ae53-c03aeae36bf3(a)36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 7, 5:54 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:> <copyrighted garbaged deleted>
> Pharmnuts always delete what they cannot intelligently (or honestly)
> respond to. Most of my interactions with you and those of your ilk
> over the years look like monologues by the time the thread closes.
> And yes, you're an idiot.
> People like you have no respect for copyrights, the law, or science.
What you know about any of the three, but especially science, cannot
be seen with an electron microscope.
> Squeal like a pig when brought before the court and feel justified when
> people stupider than you come to your defense.
Unlike your buddy Blowdip, I have not been hauled into court or needed
defending. I forget you have a problem distinguishing between us, as
your attack on him recently proved. What an idiot you are.
From: PeterB - Original on 10 Feb 2010 17:55
On Feb 9, 11:11 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 11:38 pm, PeterB - Original <p...(a)mytrashmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 11:43 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 7, 9:19 pm, Kevysmom <kevysmo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Let's not forget that he was developing a "transfer factor" that would
> > > > > substitute for the measles vaccine. His market, thus his income, would
> > > > > be greatly enhanced if there was widespread distrust of the MMR
> > > > > vaccine, which is clearly his intent.
> > > > You keep repeating this, Yet, I haven't seen any proof of such a claim.
> > > I posted it elsewhere and how he admitted to it in the GMC
> > > proceedings.
> > If you were to tell the truth, would you go "pop" with a poof of
> > smoke, or just morph into a pile of locusts?
> Listen, stupid, I posted a quote from the GMC report where Wakefield
> admitted ...
One may "admit" to activities that are illegal, but there was nothing
illegal about it.
> he was developing a measles transfer factor which would
> substitute for a vaccine. Even you are not so stupid as to believe
> that if he damaged the market for MMR, that his potion would be a
> better seller, and thus make him more money.
If you mean it's a shame that MMR continues to be used despite the
lack of evidence for its safety, regardless of Wakefield's research,
> Or, have I underestimated your stupidity?
Just your own.