From: enough on
http://blackgenocide.org/negro.html

By Tanya L. Green

"Â…I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursingÂ’
therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live."

--Deuteronomy 30:19 (NKJV

On the crisp, sunny, fall Columbus Day in 1999, organizers of the "Say
So" march approached the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court. The
marchers, who were predominantly black pastors and lay persons,
concluded their three-day protest at the site of two monumental cases:
the school desegregation Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the
pro-abortion Roe v. Wade "rights" in t he latter–converged in the
declaration of Rev. Johnny M. Hunter, the marchÂ’s sponsor and national
director of Life, Education and Resource Network (LEARN), the largest
black pro-life organization.

‘"Civil rights’ doesn’t mean anything without a right to life!"
declared Hunter. He and the other marchers were protesting the
disproportionately high number of abortions in the black community.
The high number is no accident. Many Americans–black and white–are
unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret SangerÂ’s Negro Project.
Sanger created this program in 1939, after the organization changed
its name from the American Birth Control League (ABCL) to the Birth
Control Federation of America (BCFA).

The aim of the program was to restrict–many believe exterminate–the
black population. Under the pretense of "better health" and "family
planning," Sanger cleverly implemented her plan. WhatÂ’s more shocking
is Sanger’s beguilement of black America’s créme de la créme–those
prominent, well educated and well-to-do–into executing her scheme.
Some within the black elite saw birth control as a means to attain
economic empowerment, elevate the race and garner the respect of
whites.

The Negro Project has had lasting repercussions in the black
community: "We have become victims of genocide by our own hands,"
cried Hunter at the "Say So" march.

Malthusian Eugenics

Margaret Sanger aligned herself with the eugenicists whose ideology
prevailed in the early 20th century. Eugenicists strongly espoused
racial supremacy and "purtiy"," particularly of the "Aryan" race.
Eugenicists hoped to purify the bloodlines and improve the race by
encouraging the "fit" to reproduce and the "unfit" to restrict their
reproduction. They sought to contain the "inferior" races through
segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion.

Sanger embraced Malthusian eugenics. Thomas Robert Malthus, a 19th
century cleric and professor of political economy, believed a
population time bomb threatened the existence of the human race. He
viewed social problems such as poverty, deprivation and hunger as
evidence of this "population crisis." According to writer George
Grant, Malthus condemned charities and other forms of benevolence,
because he believed they only exacerbated the problems. His answer was
to restrict population growth of certain groups of people. His
theories of population growth and economic stability became the basis
for national and international social policy. Grant quotes from
MalthusÂ’ magnum opus, An Essay on the Principle of Population,
published in six editions from 1798 to 1826:

All children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the
population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room is
made for them by the deaths of grown persons. We should facilitate,
instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations
of nature in producing this mortality.

Malthus disciples believed if Western civilization were to survive,
the physically unfit, the materially poor, the spiritually diseased,
the racially inferior, and the mentally incompetent had to be
suppressed and isolated–or even, perhaps, eliminated. His disciples
felt the subtler and more "scientific" approaches of education,
contraception, sterilization and abortion were more "practical and
acceptable ways" to ease the pressures of the alleged overpopulation.

Critics of Malthusianism said the group "produced a new vocabulary of
mumbo-jumbo. It was all hard-headed, scientific and relentless."
Further, historical facts have proved the Malthusian mathematical
scheme regarding overpopulation to be inaccurate, though many still
believe them.

Despite the falsehoods of MalthusÂ’ overpopulation claims, Sanger
nonetheless immersed herself in Malthusian eugenics. Grant wrote she
argued for birth control using the "scientifically verified" threat of
poverty, sickness, racial tension and overpopulation as its
background. SangerÂ’s publication, The Birth Control Review (founded in
1917) regularly published pro-eugenic articles from eugenicists, such
as Ernst Ruin. Although Sanger ceased editing The Birth Control Review
in 1929, the ABCL continued to use it as a platform for eugenic ideas.

Sanger built the work of the ABCL, and, ultimately, Planned
Parenthood, on the ideas and resources of the eugenics movement. Grant
reported that "virtually all of the organizationÂ’s board members were
eugenicists." Eugenicists financed the early projects, from the
opening of birth control clinics to the publishing of "revolutionary"
literature. Eugenicists comprised the speakers at conferences, authors
of literature and the providers of services "almost without the
exception." And Planned ParenthoodÂ’s international work was originally
housed in the offices of the Eugenics Society. The two organizations
were intertwined for years.

The ABCL became a legal entity on April 22, 1922, in New York. Before
that, Sanger illegally operated a birth control clinic in October
1916, in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, New York, which
eventually closed. The clinic serviced the poor immigrants who heavily
populated the area–those deemed "unfit" to reproduce.

SangerÂ’s early writings clearly reflected MalthusÂ’ influence. She
writes:

Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social
disease. Those vast, complex, interrelated organizations aiming to
control and to diminish the spread of misery and destitution and all
the menacing evils that spring out of this sinisterly fertile soil,
are the surest sign that our civilization has bred, is breeding and
perpetuating constantly increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents
and dependents.

<continued on web site>
From: Ray Fischer on
Rob Par <robpar(a)mypbmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:45:21 -0800 (PST), enough
><blinkingblythe02(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>http://blackgenocide.org/negro.html
>>
>>By Tanya L. Green
>>
>>"�I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing�
>>therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live."
>>
>>--Deuteronomy 30:19 (NKJV
>
>So even the Bible is Pro-choice. And claims that God himself gave us
>that right to choose.

Even Jesus said that it is wrong to deny people choice.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net